Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32877515›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2020

An assessment of genomic connectedness measures in Nellore cattle.

Sabrina T Amorim, Haipeng Yu, Mehdi Momen, Lúcia Galvão de Albuquerque, Angélica S Cravo Pereira, Fernando Baldi, Gota Morota

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sabrina T AmorimUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Departamento de Zootecnia, Via de acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane, CEP Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Haipeng YuDepartment of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
Mehdi MomenDepartment of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
Lúcia Galvão de AlbuquerqueUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Departamento de Zootecnia, Via de acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane, CEP Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Angélica S Cravo PereiraUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Núcleo de Apoio à Pesquisa em Melhoramento Animal, Biotecnologia e Transgenia, Rua Duque de Caxias Norte, CEP Pirassununga, SP, Brazil.
Fernando BaldiUniversidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Departamento de Zootecnia, Via de acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane, CEP Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.
Gota MorotaDepartment of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRVirginia Tech · USUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important criterion to consider in genetic evaluations is the extent of genetic connectedness across management units (MU), especially if they differ in their genetic mean. Reliable comparisons of genetic values across MU depend on the degree of connectedness: the higher the connectedness, the more reliable the comparison. Traditionally, genetic connectedness was calculated through pedigree-based methods; however, in the era of genomic selection, this can be better estimated utilizing new approaches based on genomics. Most procedures consider only additive genetic effects, which may not accurately reflect the underlying gene action of the evaluated trait, and little is known about the impact of non-additive gene action on connectedness measures. The objective of this study was to investigate the extent of genomic connectedness measures, for the first time, in Brazilian field data by applying additive and non-additive relationship matrices using a fatty acid profile data set from seven farms located in the three regions of Brazil, which are part of the three breeding programs. Myristic acid (C14:0) was used due to its importance for human health and reported presence of non-additive gene action. The pedigree included 427,740 animals and 925 of them were genotyped using the Bovine high-density genotyping chip. Six relationship matrices were constructed, parametrically and non-parametrically capturing additive and non-additive genetic effects from both pedigree and genomic data. We assessed genome-based connectedness across MU using the prediction error variance of difference (PEVD) and the coefficient of determination (CD). PEVD values ranged from 0.540 to 1.707, and CD from 0.146 to 0.456. Genomic information consistently enhanced the measures of connectedness compared to the numerator relationship matrix by at least 63%. Combining additive and non-additive genomic kernel relationship matrices or a non-parametric relationship matrix increased the capture of connectedness. Overall, the Gaussian kernel yielded the largest measure of connectedness. Our findings showed that connectedness metrics can be extended to incorporate genomic information and non-additive genetic variation using field data. We propose that different genomic relationship matrices can be designed to capture additive and non-additive genetic effects, increase the measures of connectedness, and to more accurately estimate the true state of connectedness in herds.

Indexed as

GenomicsAnimalsBrazilBreedingCattleFarmsGenomeGenotypeModels, GeneticPedigreePhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotidegenomic connectednesskernel matricesNellore cattlenon-additive gene action

Identifiers

PMID32877515
PMCPMC7792904
OpenAlexW3082229610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.