Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32877510›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2020

Bacillus subtilis: a potential growth promoter in weaned pigs in comparison to carbadox.

Yijie He, Kwangwook Kim, Lauren Kovanda, Cynthia Jinno, Minho Song, Jennifer Chase, Xunde Li, Bie Tan, Yanhong Liu

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects ofJournal of animal science and technology · 2026
    Article
  2. Phenotypic and Genomic Analysis of Swine-DerivedAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Post-weaning diarrhea caused by F18Microbiome research reports · 2025
    Review
  13. Winning the battle of intestinal peace withFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Review
  19. Impacts of F18Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  20. Protective Effects ofVeterinary sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Yijie HeDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA.
Kwangwook KimDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA.
Lauren KovandaDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA.
Cynthia JinnoDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA.
Minho SongDepartment of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea.
Jennifer ChaseSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA.
Xunde LiSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA.
Bie TanKey Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, China.
Yanhong LiuDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA.
University of California, Davis · USChinese Academy of Sciences · CNChungnam National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study was conducted to investigate the efficacy of a probiotic Bacillus subtilis strain on growth performance, diarrhea, systemic immunity, and intestinal health of weaned pigs experimentally infected with an enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and to compare the efficacy of B. subtilis with that of carbadox. Weaned pigs (n = 48, 6.17 ± 0.36 kg body weight [BW]) were individually housed in disease containment rooms and randomly allotted to one of four dietary treatments: negative control (NC, control diet without E. coli challenge), positive control (PC, control diet with E. coli challenge), and supplementation of 50 mg/kg of carbadox (antibiotic growth promotor [AGP]) or 2.56 × 109 CFU/kg of B. subtilis probiotics (PRO). The experiment lasted for 28 d with 7 d before and 21 d after the first E. coli inoculation. Fecal and blood samples were collected on days 0, 3, 7, 14, and 21 post inoculation (PI) to analyze β-hemolytic coliforms and complete blood cell count, respectively. Diarrhea score was recorded daily for each pig to calculate the frequency of diarrhea. All pigs were euthanized at day 21 PI to collect jejunal and ileal mucosa for gene expression analysis. Pigs in AGP had greater (P < 0.05) BW on days 7, 14, and 21 PI than pigs in PC and PRO groups. Supplementation of PRO enhanced pigs' BW on day 21 PI compared with the PC. Escherichia coli F18 challenge reduced (P < 0.05) average daily gain (ADG) and feed efficiency from day 0 to 21 PI, while supplementation of carbadox or PRO enhanced ADG and feed efficiency in E. coli F18-challenged pigs from day 0 to 21 PI. Pigs in AGP and PRO groups had reduced (P < 0.05) frequency of diarrhea throughout the experiment and fecal β-hemolytic coliforms on day 7 PI than pigs in the PC. Pigs in PRO had greater (P < 0.05) gene expression of CLDN1 in jejunal mucosa than pigs in the PC. Supplementation of carbadox or PRO reduced (P < 0.05) the gene expression of IL6 and PTGS2 in ileal mucosa of E. coli-infected pigs compared with pigs in the PC. Pigs in the PRO group had lower (P < 0.05) white blood cell number and neutrophil count, and serum haptoglobin concentration on day 7 PI, and less (P < 0.05) monocyte count on day 14 PI, compared with PC. In conclusion, supplementation of probiotic B. subtilis could enhance disease resistance and promote the growth performance of weaned pigs under disease challenge conditions. The potential mechanisms include but not limited to enhanced gut barrier integrity and local and systemic immune responses of weaned pigs.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacillus subtilisCarbadoxDiarrheaDietEnterotoxigenic Escherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFecesFemaleIleumIntestinal MucosaMaleProbioticsRandom AllocationSwineAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbadoxBacillus subtilisdiarrheaEscherichia coligut healthimmunityweaned pigs

Identifiers

PMID32877510
PMCPMC7523599
OpenAlexW3081910070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.