Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32877488›Full record

ArticleJornal brasileiro de nefrologia

The disparity of measuring bone mineral content using bioimpedance and dual-energy absorptiometry in the context of hyperparathyroidism.

Shirley Ferraz Crispilho, Eduardo Jorge Duque, Kalyanna Soares Bezerra, Rosa Maria R Pereira, Vanda Jorgetti, Rosilene M Elias, Rosa M A Moysés

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shirley Ferraz CrispilhoUniversidade Nove de Julho, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Eduardo Jorge DuqueUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5099-9727
Kalyanna Soares BezerraUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Rosa Maria R PereiraUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Vanda JorgettiUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4824-8879
Rosilene M EliasUniversidade Nove de Julho, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2212-041X
Rosa M A MoysésUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7902-2127
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Nove de Julho · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBody composition is critical for the evaluation of patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and can be obtained from either multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) or dual-energy absorptiometry (DXA). Although the discrepancy between the results obtained from both methods has already been described, reasons are unknown, and might be related to secondary hyperparathyroidism, which is associated with bone loss.

methodsWe have evaluated 49 patients (25 males and 24 females): 20 with CKD not on dialysis and 29 on maintenance hemodialysis [18 with severe hyperparathyroidism (HD-SHPT) and 11 submitted to parathyroidectomy (HD-PTX)]. All patients underwent DXA and BIA.

resultsThe median age and body mass index (BMI) were 49 years and 25.6 kg/m2, respectively. Patients exhibited low bone mineral content (BMC) measured by DXA, particularly those from the HD-SHPT group. The largest BMC measurement disagreement between DXA and BIA was found in the HD-SHPT group (p=0.004). Factors independently associated with this discrepancy in BMC measurement were serum phosphate (p=0.003) and patient group (p=0.027), even after adjustments for age, BMI, and gender (adjusted r2=0.186). PTX attenuated this difference. DISCUSSION: BIA should be interpreted with caution in patients with SHPT due to a loss of accuracy, which can compromise the interpretation of body composition.

Indexed as

Bone DensityHyperparathyroidism, SecondaryAbsorptiometry, PhotonBody Mass IndexElectric ImpedanceFemaleHumansMaleRenal Dialysis

Identifiers

PMID32877488
PMCPMC8257279
OpenAlexW3081667680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.