Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32877449›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward the novel coronavirus among Bangladeshis: Implications for mitigation measures.

Alak Paul, Dwaipayan Sikdar, Mohammad Mosharraf Hossain, Md Robed Amin, Farah Deeba, Janardan Mahanta, Md Akib Jabed, Mohammad Mohaiminul Islam, Sharifa Jahan Noon, Tapan Kumar Nath

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
32.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Alak PaulDepartment of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Dwaipayan SikdarDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-0529-4696
Mohammad Mosharraf HossainInstitute of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Md Robed AminDepartment of Medicine, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Farah DeebaHonorary Post-Doctoral Fellow at Macquarie University (Australia) and Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Janardan MahantaDepartment of Statistics, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Md Akib JabedDepartment of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-7109-5137
Mohammad Mohaiminul IslamDepartment of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-7074-8282
Sharifa Jahan NoonDepartment of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Tapan Kumar NathSchool of Environmental and Geographical Sciences, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Semenyih, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-6436-1778
University of Chittagong · BDDhaka Medical College and Hospital · BDUniversity of Dhaka · BDUniversity of Nottingham Malaysia Campus · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current novel coronavirus (nCoV) pandemic, COVID-19, was first reported in December 2019 in Wuhan, China, and has spread globally, causing startling loss of life, stalling the global economy, and disrupting social life. One of the challenges to contain COVID-19 is convincing people to adopt personal hygiene, social distancing, and self-quarantine practices that are related to knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of the residents of respective countries. Bangladesh, a densely populated country with a fast-growing economy and moderate literacy rate, has shown many hiccups in its efforts to implement COVID-19 policies. Understanding KAP may help policy makers produce informed decisions. This study assessed KAP in relation to COVID-19 in Bangladesh. An online survey using a pre-tested questionnaire conducted in late March 2020 attained 1,837 responses across Bangladesh. Ultimately, 1,589 completed responses were included in a statistical analysis to calculate KAP scores and their interrelations with sociodemographic variables. The overall KAP was poor, with only 33% of the participants demonstrating good knowledge, whereas 52.4% and 44.8% of the subjects showed good attitudes and practices, respectively. Sociodemographic factors had strong bearings on the KAP scores. Significantly higher KAP scores were evident in females over males, among aged 45 years and older over younger participants, and among retired workers and homemakers over students and public service employees. This study indicated a panic fuelled by poor understanding of COVID-19 associated facts and the need for the government to ensure more granular and targeted awareness campaigns in a transparent and factual manner to foster public confidence and ensure more meaningful public participation in mitigation measures. This study provides a KAP baseline regarding COVID-19 among Bangladeshis.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultBangladeshBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID32877449
PMCPMC7467312
OpenAlexW3082402696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.