Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32877432›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Cost-effectiveness of a new autoantibody test added to Computed Tomography (CT) compared to CT surveillance alone in the diagnosis of lung cancer amongst patients with indeterminate pulmonary nodules.

Andrew John Sutton, Gurdeep S Sagoo, Leon Jackson, Mike Fisher, Geoffrey Hamilton-Fairley, Andrea Murray, Adam Hill

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Liquid biopsies: the future of cancer early detection.Journal of translational medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew John SuttonInstitute of Health Economics, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7008-4770
Gurdeep S SagooTest Evaluation Group, Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Leon JacksonOncimmune Limited, City Hospital, Clinical Sciences Building, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Mike FisherOncimmune Limited, City Hospital, Clinical Sciences Building, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Geoffrey Hamilton-FairleyOncimmune Limited, City Hospital, Clinical Sciences Building, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Andrea MurrayOncimmune Limited, City Hospital, Clinical Sciences Building, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Adam HillOncimmune Limited, City Hospital, Clinical Sciences Building, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0579-5231
City Hospital · GBInstitute of Health Economics · CAUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncimmune's EarlyCDT®-Lung is a simple ELISA blood test that measures seven lung cancer specific autoantibodies and is used in the assessment of malignancy risk in patients with indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs). The objective of this study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of EarlyCDT-Lung in the diagnosis of lung cancer amongst patients with IPNs in addition to CT surveillance, compared to CT surveillance alone which is the current recommendation by the British Thoracic Society guidelines. A model consisting of a combination of a decision tree and Markov model was developed using the outcome measure of the quality adjusted life year (QALY). A life-time time horizon was adopted. The model was parameterized using a range of secondary sources. At £70 per test, EarlyCDT-Lung and CT surveillance was found to be cost-effective compared to CT surveillance alone with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of less than £2,500 depending on the test accuracy parameters used. It was also found that EarlyCDT-Lung can be priced up to £1,177 and still be cost-effective based on cost-effectiveness acceptance threshold of £20,000 / QALY. Further research to resolve parameter uncertainty, was not found to be of value. The results here demonstrate that at £70 per test the EarlyCDT-Lung will have a positive impact on patient outcomes and coupled with CT surveillance is a cost-effective approach to the management of patients with IPNs. The conclusions drawn from this analysis are robust to realistic variation in the parameters used in the model.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisTomography, X-Ray ComputedAutoantibodiesDisease ProgressionHumansLung NeoplasmsMarkov ChainsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesProbabilitySurvival AnalysisAutoantibodies

Identifiers

PMID32877432
PMCPMC7467291
OpenAlexW3081833758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.