Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32877430›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

TargetDB: A target information aggregation tool and tractability predictor.

Stephane De Cesco, John B Davis, Paul E Brennan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. A review on computational models for predicting protein solubility.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  7. Application of artificial intelligence in the development ofFrontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephane De CescoNuffield Department of Medicine, ARUK Oxford Drug Discovery Institute, Target Discovery Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United-Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4443-4217
John B DavisNuffield Department of Medicine, ARUK Oxford Drug Discovery Institute, Target Discovery Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United-Kingdom.
Paul E BrennanNuffield Department of Medicine, ARUK Oxford Drug Discovery Institute, Target Discovery Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United-Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8950-7646

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When trying to identify new potential therapeutic protein targets, access to data and knowledge is increasingly important. In a field where new resources and data sources become available every day, it is crucial to be able to take a step back and look at the wider picture in order to identify potential drug targets. While this task is routinely performed by bespoke literature searches, it is often time-consuming and lacks uniformity when comparing multiple targets at one time. To address this challenge, we developed TargetDB, a tool that aggregates public information available on given target(s) (links to disease, safety, 3D structures, ligandability, novelty, etc.) and assembles it in an easy to read output ready for the researcher to analyze. In addition, we developed a target scoring system based on the desirable attributes of good therapeutic targets and machine learning classification system to categorize novel targets as having promising or challenging tractrability. In this manuscript, we present the methodology used to develop TargetDB as well as test cases.

Indexed as

Databases as TopicAlgorithmsAnimalsData MiningDiseaseDrug DevelopmentHumansMachine LearningMiceModels, ChemicalProteinsSoftwareProteins

Identifiers

PMID32877430
PMCPMC7467329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.