ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2021
Measurement of femoral axial offset.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Goreisan May Reduce Postoperative Swelling and Pain After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Comparative Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Relationship Among Global Femoral Offset, Leg Lengthening, and Tibiofemoral Rotation After Total Hip Arthroplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Influence of limb position on femoral neck anteversion angle measurement during computed tomography imaging.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2025Article
- Impact of Hip Rotation Angle Following Total Hip Arthroplasty with Leg Lengthening.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Does Preoperative Virtual Reality Experience Enhance Implant Positioning Accuracy in Total Hip Arthroplasty?Cureus · 2024Article
- The Sum of the Leg Length Discrepancy and the Difference in Global Femoral Offset Is Equal to That of the Contralateral Intact Side and Improves Postoperative Outcomes after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Three-Dimensional Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The association of postoperative global femoral offset with total hip arthroplasty outcomes.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Measurement of femoral axial offset.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose to examine the accuracy and reproducibility of the femoral axial offset measured from the retrocondylar plane by computed tomography (CT). Bone specimens of the femur of 15 males and 15 females were analyzed. CT imaging was performed and data of the coordinates were collected (center of femoral head, center of an ellipse around greater trochanter, center of an ellipse around the base of femoral neck, posterior edge of great trochanter, and both posterior condyles). The angle between the line connecting center of the femoral head and center of an ellipse around greater trochanter and the line connecting both posterior condyles was set as anteversion 1. The angle between the line connecting the center of femoral head and center of an ellipse around base of the femoral neck and the line connecting both posterior condyles was set as anteversion 2. The femoral axial offset was measured from the retrocondylar plane. Measurements were performed three times on the same subject, and intrarater reliability (ICC) was determined. In addition, interrater reliability (ICC) was determined by comparing data from three raters. The mean value for anteversion 1 was 20.1° for males and 22.7° for females. The values for anteversion 2 were 16.0° and 19.9° for males and females, respectively. Offset was 34.0 and 33.4 mm in males and females, respectively. Intrarater ICC and interrater ICC exceeded 0.81 for both methods, suggesting that the method of measurement was reliable. Accuracy and reproducibility of the measurement of femoral axial offset from the retrocondylar plane were high.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.