ArticleEuropean radiology2021
Identifying normal mammograms in a large screening population using artificial intelligence.
Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Use of AI as a Third Reader and During Consensus in a Double Reading Breast Cancer Screening Program in Sweden
Use of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Screening: Impact of AI-Assisted Single Reading by One Radiologist on Screening Quality Indicators Compared to Standard Double Reading by Two Radiologists Without AI
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.
- Frequency and characteristics of errors by artificial intelligence (AI) in reading screening mammography: a systematic review.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Use of artificial intelligence for image analysis in breast cancer screening programmes: systematic review of test accuracy.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021Pooled it
- From algorithms to patient outcomes - lessons from one of the first randomized trials of AI in medicine.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Performance across different versions of an artificial intelligence model for screen-reading of mammograms.European radiology · 2026Article
- Evaluating an AI-driven Triaging Workflow for MRI-based Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Simulation Study.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2026Observational
- AI-based triage and decision support in mammography and digital tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening: a paired, noninferiority trial.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical Performance Tradeoffs of ChatGPT-5.2 Thinking (OpenAI) Compared with Radiologist Interpretation in Biopsy-Referred Mammography: Cancer Detection, False Positives, and Laterality.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
- Assessing the robustness of AI lesion risk scores at different exposure settings using an anthropomorphic breast phantom.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2026Article
- Combined use of two artificial intelligence-based algorithms for mammography triaging: a retrospective simulation study.European radiology · 2026Article
- Navigating the future of mammography triaging: insights from combined usage of AI algorithms in breast cancer screening.European radiology · 2026Article
- Results from a Swedish model-based analysis of the cost-effectiveness of AI-assisted digital mammography.European radiology · 2026Article
- Enhancing breast positioning quality through real-time AI feedback.European radiology · 2026Article
- Impact of AI on Breast Cancer Detection Rates in Mammography by Radiologists of Varying Experience Levels in Singapore: Preliminary Comparative Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Workload reduction of digital breast tomosynthesis screening using artificial intelligence and synthetic mammography: a simulation study.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- Improving Benign and Malignant Classifications in Mammography with ROI-Stratified Deep Learning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Foundation models for radiology-the position of the AI for Health Imaging (AI4HI) network.Insights into imaging · 2025Review
- Deep learning on routine full-breast mammograms enhances lymph node metastasis prediction in early breast cancer.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a multi-stage self-supervised learning model for optical coherence tomography image classification.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Diagnostic test accuracy of AI-assisted mammography for breast imaging: a narrative review.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to identify normal mammograms in a screening population.
methodsIn this retrospective study, 9581 double-read mammography screening exams including 68 screen-detected cancers and 187 false positives, a subcohort of the prospective population-based Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, were analysed with a deep learning-based AI system. The AI system categorises mammograms with a cancer risk score increasing from 1 to 10. The effect on cancer detection and false positives of excluding mammograms below different AI risk thresholds from reading by radiologists was investigated. A panel of three breast radiologists assessed the radiographic appearance, type, and visibility of screen-detected cancers assigned low-risk scores (≤ 5). The reduction of normal exams, cancers, and false positives for the different thresholds was presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
resultsIf mammograms scored 1 and 2 were excluded from screen-reading, 1829 (19.1%; 95% CI 18.3-19.9) exams could be removed, including 10 (5.3%; 95% CI 2.1-8.6) false positives but no cancers. In total, 5082 (53.0%; 95% CI 52.0-54.0) exams, including 7 (10.3%; 95% CI 3.1-17.5) cancers and 52 (27.8%; 95% CI 21.4-34.2) false positives, had low-risk scores. All, except one, of the seven screen-detected cancers with low-risk scores were judged to be clearly visible.
conclusionsThe evaluated AI system can correctly identify a proportion of a screening population as cancer-free and also reduce false positives. Thus, AI has the potential to improve mammography screening efficiency. KEY POINTS: • Retrospective study showed that AI can identify a proportion of mammograms as normal in a screening population. • Excluding normal exams from screening using AI can reduce false positives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.