Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32876817›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology2020

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, an enigma, and the ten enigmas of medial UKA.

Anurag Mittal, Prashant Meshram, Woo Hyun Kim, Tae Kyun Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. No difference in mobile and fixed bearing partial knee arthroplasty in octogenarians: a clinical trial.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anurag MittalTK Orthopedic Surgery, 55 Dongpangyo-ro, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13535, Republic of Korea.
Prashant MeshramDepartment of Orthopaedics, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, 2360 West Joppa Road, Suite 306, Baltimore, MD, 21093, USA.
Woo Hyun KimTK Orthopedic Surgery, 55 Dongpangyo-ro, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13535, Republic of Korea.
Tae Kyun KimTK Orthopedic Surgery, 55 Dongpangyo-ro, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13535, Republic of Korea. osktk2000@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7791-7421

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a bone- and ligament-sparing alternative to total knee arthroplasty in the patients with end-stage single-compartment degeneration of the knee. Despite being a successful procedure, the multiple advantages of UKA do not correlate with its usage, most likely due to the concerns regarding prosthesis survivability, patient selection, ideal bearing design, and judicious use of advanced technology among many others. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to review and summarize the debated literature and discuss the controversies as "Ten Enigmas of UKA."

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeHumansKnee ProsthesisOsteoarthritis, KneePatient SelectionProsthesis FailureBearing surfaceCementlessCost effectivenessIndicationsUKAUnicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID32876817
PMCPMC7468046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.