ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2021
Prospective application of implementation science theories and frameworks to inform use of PROMs in routine clinical care within an integrated pain network.
Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electronic Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Primary Health Care: Mixed Methods Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Understanding factors impacting patient-reported outcome measures integration in routine clinical practice: an umbrella review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Understanding Implementation of a Technology-Facilitated Hypertension Model in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Realist Evaluation of Staff Experiences.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Comparing the determinants of health perception and quality of life over time in heart and lung diseases: structural equation modeling.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Overcoming barriers and embedding processes to sustainably deliver high-dose post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation: a mixed methods longitudinal process evaluation.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Mapping Caregiver Needs' Assessment Tools for Family and Friend Caregivers: A Rapid Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Evaluating the use of the consolidated framework for implementation research in primary care settings: a systematic review.Implementation science communications · 2026Review
- Towards enhancing the representativeness of patient-reported outcomes collection at community cancer centers.Advances in patient-reported outcomes · 2025Article
- Impact of comprehensive psychological cognitive nursing on the quality of life of patients with chronic pain and depression.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Customizing workflows for electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) symptom monitoring using the action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT) framework.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Enhancing provider adoption of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) through implementation science: insights from two international workshops.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025Article
- Characteristics of Quality Improvement Projects in Health Services: A Systematic Scoping Review.Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2025Article
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Evaluating the implementation of PROMs and PREMs in routine clinical care: co-design of tools from the perspective of patients and healthcare professionals.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2025Article
- Determinants of general health perception among individuals with chronic low back pain overtime: structural equation modeling.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Barriers and facilitators to high-volume evidence-based innovation and implementation in a large, community-based learning health system.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Use of implementation mapping to develop a multifaceted implementation strategy for an electronic prospective surveillance model for cancer rehabilitation.Implementation science communications · 2024Article
- Barriers to and enablers of the use of the Otology Questionnaire Amsterdam in clinical practice-a qualitative post-implementation study.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe objective of this study is to present the implementation science approaches that were used before implementing electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) across an integrated chronic pain network that includes primary, rehabilitation, and hospital-based care.
methodsThe Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to identify potential barriers and enablers to the use of ePROMS by primary care clinicians. In rehabilitation and tertiary care, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation (CFIR) was used to guide the identification of determinants of implementations, through observation of workflow, patient and clinician surveys, and clinician interviews. A mixed-method concurrent design comprising a quantitative and qualitative analysis was used. The results were reviewed by a steering committee to iteratively inform the ePROM implementation plan. The Proctor framework of evaluation was used to guide the development of an evaluation plan for the implementation of ePROMs in the integrated chronic pain network.
resultsBoth frameworks provided similar results with respect to healthcare provider knowledge, behaviour, and experience interpreting PROM scores. The TDF and CFIR frameworks differed in identifying organizational-level determinants. The resultant implementation plan was structured around the adoption of PROMs to inform individual treatment planning and quality improvement. The evaluation plan focused on implementation and impact outcomes to evaluate the ePROM intervention.
conclusionsThe TDF and CFIR guided the development of a multi-component knowledge translation and training intervention that will address multiple gaps and barriers to implementation of PROMs across the integrated network. The ePROM intervention will aim to increase clinicians' knowledge and skills and foster best practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.