Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32876744›Full record

Observational studyRheumatology international2021

Persistence on biologic DMARD monotherapy after achieving rheumatoid arthritis disease control on combination therapy: retrospective analysis of corrona registry data.

Dimitrios A Pappas, Heather J Litman, Tamara Lesperance, Greg Kricorian, Elaine Karis, Sabrina Rebello, Winnie Hua, Neil A Accortt, Scott Stryker

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Rheumatology international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dimitrios A PappasDepartment of Epidemiology and Outcomes Research, Corrona, LLC, Waltham, MA, USA. dpappas@corrona.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8338-027X
Heather J LitmanDepartment of Biostatistics, Corrona, LLC, Waltham, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3511-4078
Tamara LesperanceDOCS Global, Inc., North Wales, PA, USA.
Greg KricorianUS Medical Affairs, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9419-9836
Elaine KarisUS Medical Affairs, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8520-2549
Sabrina RebelloDepartment of Epidemiology and Outcomes Research, Corrona, LLC, Waltham, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0201-4030
Winnie HuaDepartment of Biostatistics, Corrona, LLC, Waltham, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5222-9187
Neil A AccorttCenter for Observational Research, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0522-0769
Scott StrykerCenter for Observational Research, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0404-4487
Amgen (United States) · USHealth Outcomes Solutions (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) monotherapy may enhance adherence and decrease adverse events compared to combination therapy with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs); however, persistence with bDMARD monotherapy has not been extensively studied. We explore persistence of etanercept monotherapy and monotherapy with other tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) among patients first achieving remission/low disease activity (LDA) while on combination therapy with csDMARDs and a TNFi. Using Corrona registry data, the percentage of patients persistent with the index TNFi (etanercept versus other TNFis) over 6 and 12 months was determined. Factors influencing persistence and treatment patterns at 6 and 12 months were examined. Among 617 eligible patients, 56% of 182 patients on etanercept and 45% of 435 patients on other TNFis persisted with monotherapy at 6 months, 46% and 33%, respectively, at 12 months. Across first-line and subsequent biologic DMARDs, etanercept persistence was greater than other TNFi persistence by 10.8% (95% CI 2.1%, 19.6%) at 6 months and 11.4% (95% CI 0.9%, 21.9%) at 12 months. Patients on other TNFis were more likely to require reintroduction of csDMARD after 6 months (45% versus 35% for etanercept). Remission was the key predictor of persistence for both etanercept and other TNFi monotherapies. This retrospective, cohort study of registry data reflecting real-world practice indicates patients who achieve remission/LDA with combination csDMARD and TNFi therapy may successfully transition to TNFi monotherapy. Patients on etanercept monotherapy experienced greater persistence and less frequent reintroduction of a csDMARD than was observed for patients on other TNFi monotherapies.

Indexed as

AgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiological ProductsDrug Therapy, CombinationEtanerceptFemaleHumansMaleMedication AdherenceMethotrexateMiddle AgedRegistriesRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsEtanerceptMethotrexateTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsAntirheumatic drugsArthritisDisease-modifying antirheumatic drugsEtanerceptMethotrexateRheumatoidTNF inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID32876744
PMCPMC7835165
OpenAlexW3082376165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.