Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32876686›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2020

Commissioning of total body irradiation using plastic bead bags.

Yuichi Akino, Shintaro Maruoka, Katsuyuki Yano, Hiroshi Abe, Fumiaki Isohashi, Yuji Seo, Keisuke Tamari, Takero Hirata, Manabu Kawakami, Yoshiki Nakae and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yuichi AkinoOncology Center, Osaka University Hospital, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Shintaro MaruokaNippon Life Hospital, Nishi-ku, Osaka 550-0006, Japan.
Katsuyuki YanoNippon Life Hospital, Nishi-ku, Osaka 550-0006, Japan.
Hiroshi AbeNippon Life Hospital, Nishi-ku, Osaka 550-0006, Japan.
Fumiaki IsohashiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Yuji SeoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Keisuke TamariDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Takero HirataDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Manabu KawakamiNippon Life Hospital, Nishi-ku, Osaka 550-0006, Japan.
Yoshiki NakaeNippon Life Hospital, Nishi-ku, Osaka 550-0006, Japan.
Yoshihiro TanakaDepartment of Radiation Therapy, Japanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Kyoto 605-0981, Japan.
Kazuhiko OgawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of total body irradiation (TBI) is to deliver a dose to the whole body with uniformity within ±10%. The purpose of this study was to establish the technique of TBI using plastic bead bags. A lifting TBI bed, Model ORP-TBI-MN, was used. The space between the patient's body and the acrylic walls of the bed was filled with polyacetal bead bags. Patients were irradiated by a 10 MV photon beam with a source to mid-plane distance of 400 cm. The monitor unit (MU) was calculated by dose-per-MU, tissue-phantom-ratio and a spoiler factor measured in solid water using an ionization chamber. The phantom-scatter correction factor, off-center ratio and the effective density of the beads were also measured. Diode detectors were used for in vivo dosimetry (IVD). The effective density of the beads was 0.90 ± 0.09. The point doses calculated in an I'mRT phantom with and without heterogeneity material showed good agreement, with measurements within 3%. An end-to-end test was performed using a RANDO phantom. The mean ± SD (range) of the differences between the calculated and IVD-measured mid-plane doses was 1.1 ± 4.8% (-5.9 to 5.0%). The differences between the IVD-measured doses and the doses calculated with Acuros XB of the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) were within 5%. For two patients treated with this method, the differences between the calculated and IVD-measured doses were within ±6% when excluding the chest region. We have established the technique of TBI using plastic bead bags. The TPS may be useful to roughly estimate patient dose.

Indexed as

Phantoms, ImagingRadiotherapy DosageAlgorithmsEquipment DesignHumansParticle AcceleratorsPhotonsPlasticsRadiation DosageRadiometryRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray ComputedWaterWhole-Body IrradiationPlasticsWaterAcuros XBin vivo dosimetrytotal body irradiationtreatment planning

Identifiers

PMID32876686
PMCPMC7674696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.