Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32876682›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Assessment of Receipt of the First Home Health Care Visit After Hospital Discharge Among Older Adults.

Jun Li, Mingyu Qi, Rachel M Werner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Impact of Hurricane Harvey on Home Health Care Delivery for Medicare Beneficiaries.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Post-acute Home Health Services Among Older Adults With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Trends in the Use of Medicare Home Health Care among Congregate Living Residents.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Home health utilization in the Veterans Health Administration: Are there rural and urban differences?The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jun LiDepartment of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Mingyu QiDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Rachel M WernerDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Philadelphia VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

The effectiveness of post-acute careR01HS024266 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WERNER, RACHEL M · 2015 to 2017
$710k
Training in Healthcare Financing, Organization and Delivery for Aging PopulationsT32AG051090 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PAULY, MARK, WERNER, RACHEL M · 2015 to 2019
$652k
Understanding the effects of Medicare’s home health Quality of Patient Care Star Ratings: patient choice and unintended consequencesR36HS026836 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LI, JUN · 2019 to 2019
$42k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS024266AHRQ HHS R36 HS026836NIA NIH HHS T32 AG051090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Home health care is one of the fastest growing postacute services in the US and is increasingly important in the era of coronavirus disease 2019 and payment reform, yet it is unknown whether patients who need home health care are receiving it. Objective: To examine how often patients referred to home health care at hospital discharge receive it and whether there is evidence of disparities. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used Medicare data regarding the postacute home health care setting from October 1, 2015, through September 30, 2016. The participants were Medicare fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries who were discharged alive from a hospital with a referral to home health care (2 379 506 discharges). Statistical analysis was performed from July 2019 to June 2020. Exposures: Hospital referral to home health care. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes included whether discharges received their first home health care visit within 14 days of hospital discharge and the number of days between hospital discharge and the first home health visit. Differences in the likelihood of receiving home health care across patient, zip code, and hospital characteristics were also examined. Results: Among 2 379 506 discharges from the hospital with a home health care referral, 1 358 697 patients (57.1%) were female, 468 762 (19.7%) were non-White, and 466 383 (19.6%) were dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid; patients had a mean (SD) age of 73.9 (11.9) years and 4.1 (2.1) Elixhauser comorbidities. Only 1 284 300 patients (54.0%) discharged from the hospital with a home health referral received home health care services within 14 days of discharge. Of the remaining 1 095 206 patients (46.0%) discharged, 37.7% (896 660 discharges) never received any home health care, while 8.3% (198 546 discharges) were institutionalized or died within 14 days without a preceding home health care visit. Patients who were Black or Hispanic received home health at lower rates than did patients who were White (48.0% [95% CI, 47.8%-48.1%] of Black and 46.1% [95% CI, 45.7%-46.5%] of Hispanic discharges received home health within 14 days compared with 55.3% [95% CI, 55.2%-55.4%] of White discharges). In addition, disadvantaged patients waited longer for their first home health care visit. For example, patients living in high-unemployment zip codes waited a mean of 2.0 days (95% CI, 2.0-2.0 days), whereas those living in low-unemployment zip codes waited 1.8 days (95% CI, 1.8-1.8 days). Conclusions and Relevance: Disparities in the use of home health care remain an issue in the US. As home health care is increasingly presented as a safer alternative to institutional postacute care during coronavirus disease 2019, and payment reforms continue to pressure hospitals to discharge patients home, ensuring the availability of safe and equitable care will be crucial to maintaining high-quality care.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityReferral and ConsultationAftercareAgedAged, 80 and overBlack or African AmericanCross-Sectional StudiesFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHispanic or LatinoHome Care ServicesHumansMaleMedicaidMedicare

Identifiers

PMID32876682
PMCPMC7489821
OpenAlexW3082520063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.