Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32876654›Full record

Trial reportJAMA cardiology2020

Coronary Angiography After Cardiac Arrest Without ST Segment Elevation: One-Year Outcomes of the COACT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jorrit S Lemkes, Gladys N Janssens, Nina W van der Hoeven, Lucia S D Jewbali, Eric A Dubois, Martijn M Meuwissen, Topm A Rijpstra, Hans A Bosker, Michiel J Blans, Gabe B Bleeker and 29 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes : Statement of endorsement by the NVVC.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

39 authors.

Jorrit S LemkesDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Gladys N JanssensDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Nina W van der HoevenDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Lucia S D JewbaliThorax Center, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Eric A DuboisThorax Center, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Martijn M MeuwissenDepartment of Cardiology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
Topm A RijpstraDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
Hans A BoskerDepartment of Cardiology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
Michiel J BlansDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
Gabe B BleekerDepartment of Cardiology, HAGA Hospital, Den Haag, the Netherlands.
Remon R BaakDepartment of Intensive care medicine, HAGA Hospital, Den Haag, the Netherlands.
George J VlachojannisDepartment of Cardiology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Bob J W EikemansDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Pim van der HarstDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Iwan C C van der HorstDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Michiel VoskuilDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Joris J van der HeijdenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Albertus BeishuizenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Martin StoelDepartment of Cardiology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Cyril CamaroDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Hans van der HoevenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Jose P HenriquesDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Alexander P J VlaarDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Maarten A VinkDepartment of Cardiology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Bas van den BogaardDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ton A C M HeestermansDepartment of Cardiology, Noord West Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, the Netherlands.
Wouter de RuijterDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Noord West Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, the Netherlands.
Thijs S R DelnoijDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, University Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Harry J G M CrijnsDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Gillian A J JessurunDepartment of Cardiology, Scheper Hospital, Emmen, the Netherlands.
Pranobe V OemrawsinghDepartment of Cardiology, Haaglanden Medical Center, Den Haag, the Netherlands.
Marcel T M GosselinkDepartment of Cardiology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Koos PlompDepartment of Cardiology, Ter Gooi Hospital, Blaricum, the Netherlands.
Michael MagroDepartment of Cardiology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Paul W G ElbersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Eva M SpoormansDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Peter M van de VenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Heleen M Oudemans-van StraatenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Niels van RoyenDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Ischemic heart disease is a common cause of cardiac arrest. However, randomized data on long-term clinical outcomes of immediate coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients successfully resuscitated from cardiac arrest in the absence of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are lacking. Objective: To determine whether immediate coronary angiography improves clinical outcomes at 1 year in patients after cardiac arrest without signs of STEMI, compared with a delayed coronary angiography strategy. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prespecified analysis of a multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial evaluated 552 patients who were enrolled in 19 Dutch centers between January 8, 2015, and July 17, 2018. The study included patients who experienced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with a shockable rhythm who were successfully resuscitated without signs of STEMI. Follow-up was performed at 1 year. Data were analyzed, using the intention-to-treat principle, between August 29 and October 10, 2019. Interventions: Immediate coronary angiography and PCI if indicated or coronary angiography and PCI if indicated, delayed until after neurologic recovery. Main Outcomes and Measures: Survival, myocardial infarction, revascularization, implantable cardiac defibrillator shock, quality of life, hospitalization for heart failure, and the composite of death or myocardial infarction or revascularization after 1 year. Results: At 1 year, data on 522 of 552 patients (94.6%) were available for analysis. Of these patients, 413 were men (79.1%); mean (SD) age was 65.4 (12.3) years. A total of 162 of 264 patients (61.4%) in the immediate angiography group and 165 of 258 patients (64.0%) in the delayed angiography group were alive (odds ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.63-1.28). The composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, or repeated revascularization since the index hospitalization was met in 112 patients (42.9%) in the immediate group and 104 patients (40.6%) in the delayed group (odds ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.77-1.56). No significant differences between the groups were observed for the other outcomes at 1-year follow-up. For example, the rate of ICD shocks was 20.4% in the immediate group and 16.2% in the delayed group (odds ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.66-2.64). Conclusions and Relevance: In this trial of patients successfully resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and without signs of STEMI, a strategy of immediate angiography was not found to be superior to a strategy of delayed angiography with respect to clinical outcomes at 1 year. Coronary angiography in this patient group can therefore be delayed until after neurologic recovery without affecting outcomes. Trial Registration: trialregister.nl Identifier: NTR4973.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestResuscitationST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32876654
PMCPMC7489423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.