Observational studyAnaesthesiology intensive therapy2020
Determining airway complications during anaesthesia induction: a prospective, observational, cross-sectional clinical study.
Observational study in Anaesthesiology intensive therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Remimazolam in elderly patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA: protocol for a randomized clinical trial.International journal of surgery protocols · 2025Article
- ASSESSMENT OF STANDARD ANTHROPOMETRIC AIRWAY CHARACTERISTICS RELEVANT FOR AIRWAY MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA SYNDROME DURING SLEEP BREATHING DISORDER SURGERY: A RETROSPECTIVE, SINGLE CENTER STUDY.Acta clinica Croatica · 2023Article
- The impact of video games on training: can it change the game of endotracheal intubation?Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough postoperative early airway complications are rarely observed, when they do develop, fatal results such as brain damage and cardiac arrest may occur. The Royal College of Anaesthetists and Difficult Airway Society investigated airway complications developing during anaesthesia over a period of 12 months within the context of the Fourth National Audit Project (NAP4) study. Inspired by that multicentre research project, this study aims to identify early airway complications that can develop in relation to anaesthesia induction in our hospital.
methodsAfter our proposed study received approval from the Ethical Council, adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia at our operating theatres within the period of January-July 2018 were included in it. Demographic data, ventilation, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, Cormack-Lehane scores, tools that are used in airway management, and complications were recorded.
resultsOut of 909 patients in total, 752 were intubated; a laryngeal mask was placed on 157 of these patients. The complication rate was 5%, and the 3 most frequently observed complications were desaturation, bronchospasm and pharyngeal injuries. In the group having complications, the body mass index value, Cormack-Lehane, Mallampati, and ventilation scores were significantly higher than those with no complications.
conclusionsDuring routine general anaesthesia induction at our clinic, major or minor airway complications have developed with a frequency of 5%, and it was determined that desaturation was the most frequent reversible cause.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.