ArticleAnnals of medicine2021
Outcome of acute myocardial infarction versus stable coronary artery disease patients treated with coronary bypass surgery.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning-based prediction of 1-year mortality risk after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Clinical Significance of MicroRNA-299-3p in Coronary Artery Disease Based on Bioinformatics Analysis.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2024Article
- Association between glucose-to-lymphocyte ratio and in-hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction patients.PloS one · 2023Article
- Heparin Immobilization of Tissue Engineered Xenogeneic Small Diameter Arterial Scaffold Improve Endothelialization.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2022Article
- Digoxin use and outcomes after myocardial infarction in patients with atrial fibrillation.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2022Article
- Machine-Learning Techniques for Feature Selection and Prediction of Mortality in Elderly CABG Patients.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo study the long-term outcome differences between acute myocardial infarction (MI) and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients treated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
methodsWe studied retrospectively patients with MI (
resultsIn-hospital mortality (8.6% vs. 1.6%; OR 5.94;
conclusionMI patients have poorer short- and long-term outcomes compared to stable CAD patients after CABG and risk difference continues to increase with time. Key Messages Patients with myocardial infarction have poorer short- and long-term outcomes compared to stable coronary artery disease patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Higher risk of death continues also in stabilized first-year myocardial infarct survivors. The importance of efficient secondary prevention and follow-up highlights in post-myocardial infarct population after CABG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.