Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32875586›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics2021

Analysis and improvement measures of telephone drug consultation in a specialized hospital of obstetrics and gynaecology in China.

Xianli Wang, Yanyu Pang, Hui Sun, Yanping Huang, Shizhou Lin, Jin Jing, Jing Tang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Real-world pharmacological treatment of patients with postpartum depression in China from 2016 to 2020: A cross-sectional analysis.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xianli WangDepartment of Pharmacy, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yanyu PangDepartment of Pharmacy, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hui SunDepartment of Pharmacy, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yanping HuangDepartment of Pharmacy, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shizhou LinDepartment of Pharmacy, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jin JingDepartment of Pharmacy, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jing TangDepartment of Pharmacy, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3100-1842
Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University · CN

Funding

Shanghai "Rising Stars of Medical Talent" Youth Development Program AB83030002019004The Key Specialty Construction Project of Shanghai Clinical Pharmacy AB83110002017005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN AND

objectiveDrug consultation is an important part of pharmaceutical care offered by clinical pharmacists. We explored the characteristics of telephone drug consultations in an obstetrics and gynaecology speciality hospital to provide a reference as to how to improve drug consultation and pharmaceutical care.

methodsWe retrospectively analysed records of telephone consultations regarding medication use between 2014 and 2019 in our hospital. Any consultation cases with incomplete records were excluded from our analysis. Of the 1353 consultation cases included in our study, we further classified them into different categories based on the content of the consultations, the type of medications being inquired about, and the groups of people who sought medication guidance. Pareto analysis was performed to separate the main issues the callers were concerned about from the more minor concerns. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The medication issues that prompted the caller to consult with our clinical pharmacists could be divided into 12 categories, among which the main issues concerned usage and dosage, choice of drug variety, drug incompatibility (drug mixture in infusion bag or tube), adjustment of the treatment plan, and skin tests (cumulative percentage 76.3%). The minor issues involved medication use during pregnancy and lactation and adverse reactions. The top three types of drugs that callers asked about were antimicrobials (600 cases, 44.4%), anti-tumour drugs (151 cases, 11.2%) and reproductive system drugs (111 cases, 8.2%). The callers could be divided into four groups as follows: doctors (865 cases, 63.9%), nurses (280 cases, 20.7%), patients (116 cases, 8.6%) and other medical professionals (92 cases, 6.8%). WHAT IS NEW AND

conclusionUsage and dosage, choice of drug variety, drug incompatibility, adjustment of treatment plan and skin tests represented the main issues for telephone drug consultations in our hospital. Doctors and nurses were most likely to consult clinical pharmacists regarding these issues. Improved drug consultation services are needed to allow more patients to have access to advice from pharmacists. Such access would better enable pharmacists to fulfil their roles in advising the appropriate use of drugs to ensure better patient care and medication compliance.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleGynecologyHospitalsHumansMedical RecordsObstetricsPharmaceutical PreparationsPregnancyQuality ImprovementReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesTelemedicineYoung AdultPharmaceutical Preparationsappropriate use of drugsdrug consultationpharmaceutical careservice quality

Identifiers

PMID32875586
PMCPMC7818494
OpenAlexW3082583342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.