Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32875483›Full record

ArticleMolecular neurobiology2020

Large-Scale Analysis Reveals Gene Signature for Survival Prediction in Primary Glioblastoma.

Birbal Prasad, Yongji Tian, Xinzhong Li

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular neurobiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. PTPRN promotes glioma cell proliferation, migration, and invasion by regulating the EMT pathway.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Predicting Survival in Glioblastoma Using Gene Expression Databases: A Neural Network Analysis.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2024
    Article
  13. Brain tumour genetic network signatures of survival.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Birbal PrasadNational Horizons Centre, School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Darlington, DL1 1HG, UK.
Yongji TianBeijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, People's Republic of China.
Xinzhong LiNational Horizons Centre, School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Darlington, DL1 1HG, UK. X.Li@tees.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6411-4045
Teesside University · GBCapital Medical University · CN

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 764281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive and common primary central nervous system tumour. Despite extensive therapy, GBM patients usually have poor prognosis with a median survival of 12-15 months. Novel molecular biomarkers that can improve survival prediction and help with treatment strategies are still urgently required. Here we aimed to robustly identify a gene signature panel for improved survival prediction in primary GBM patients. We identified 2166 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) using meta-analysis of microarray datasets comprising of 955 samples (biggest primary GBM cohort for such studies as per our knowledge) and 3368 DEGs from RNA-seq dataset with 165 samples. Based on the 1443 common DEGs, using univariate Cox and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) with multivariate Cox regression, we identified a survival associated 4-gene signature panel including IGFBP2, PTPRN, STEAP2 and SLC39A10 and thereafter established a risk score model that performed well in survival prediction. High-risk group patients had significantly poorer survival as compared with those in the low-risk group (AUC = 0.766 for 1-year prediction). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that predictive value of the 4-gene signature panel was independent of other clinical and pathological features and hence is a potential prognostic biomarker. More importantly, we validated this signature in three independent GBM cohorts to test its generality. In conclusion, our integrated analysis using meta-analysis approach maximizes the use of the available gene expression data and robustly identified a 4-gene panel for predicting survival in primary GBM.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticBrain NeoplasmsCohort StudiesDatabases, GeneticFemaleGlioblastomaHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsBiomarkerGlioblastomaMeta-analysisPrognosisSurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID32875483
PMCPMC7541357
OpenAlexW3082664972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.