Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32875450›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Assessing energy security in Africa based on multi-dimensional approach of principal composite analysis.

David Ajene Alemzero, Huaping Sun, Muhammad Mohsin, Nadeem Iqbal, Muhammad Nadeem, Xuan Vinh Vo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 184 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sustainable impact of COVID-19 on education projects: aspects of naturalism.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Assessment of rice and wheat production efficiency based on data envelopment analysis.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

David Ajene AlemzeroSchool of Finance and Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China. awelingazure@gmail.com.
Huaping SunSchool of Finance and Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China.
Muhammad MohsinSchool of Finance and Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China.
Nadeem IqbalDepartment of Business Administration, Ghazi University, D.G. Khan, Pakistan. niqbal@gudgk.edu.pk.
Muhammad NadeemUniversity of International Business and Economics, Beijing, China.
Xuan Vinh VoInstitute of Business Research and CFVG University of Economics, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Jiangsu University · CNUniversity of Economics Ho Chi Minh City · VNGhazi University · PKUniversity of International Business and Economics · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of energy security has become an increasingly challenging issue in Africa, forcing energy-deficient countries to forge mutual partnerships with energy sufficient countries to access it for their domestic consumption. This study formulates a composite index of energy security in Africa as well as evaluates its impacts and trends using a sample of 28 countries on the continent, during the 2000-2018 period by using a principal composite factor analysis (PCA), with the series of 13 variables. Further interpretation was carried out using these tests: Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy and Bartlett's test of sphericity, Pearson correlation test, and Cronbach's alpha test. The key results show a trend of energy insecurity among the countries studied, as energy imports loads high in most countries as well as per capita emission, together with fossil fuel source consumption correlating high. These results validate the stark reality on the African continent. The inference from the results of the anaylsis conclude that the principal component analysis (PCA) results of the energy index were considered fit and reliable for the analysis, with the most important Cronbach's alpha test coefficient of 0.8797, far above the standard 0.6 model reliability level. Based on this study, the paper proffers there should be increased intra-regional trading of energy among the various power pools on the continent and increased regional renewable energy investments as well as investment in energy infrastructure, measures to reduce electricity system losses, environmental sustainability, and the adoption of energy in efficiency on the continent.

Indexed as

Fossil FuelsRenewable EnergyAfricaFactor Analysis, StatisticalReproducibility of ResultsFossil FuelsAfricaComposite indexEnergy securityMultidimensional approachPCA

Identifiers

PMID32875450
OpenAlexW3082909006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.