Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32875412›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021

Evaluating readmissions following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the state of New York.

Maria S Altieri, Jie Yang, Xiaoyue Zhang, Chencan Zhu, Amin Madani, Jed Castillo, Mark Talamini, Aurora Pryor

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria S AltieriDivision of General and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, 600 Moye Boulevard, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA. Altieri.m@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6976-1631
Jie YangDepartment of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Xiaoyue ZhangDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Chencan ZhuDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Amin MadaniDepartment of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jed CastilloDivision of General and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, 600 Moye Boulevard, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA.
Mark TalaminiDepartment of Surgery, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Aurora PryorDepartment of Surgery, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Stony Brook University Hospital · USEast Carolina University · USStony Brook University · USUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHospital readmissions constitute an important component of associated costs of a disease and can contribute a significant burden to healthcare. The majority of studies evaluating readmissions following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) comprise of single center studies and thus can underestimate the actual incidence of readmission. We sought to examine the rate and causes of readmissions following LC using a large longitudinal database.

methodsThe New York SPARCS database was used to identify all adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign biliary disease between 2000 and 2016. Due to the presence of a unique identifier, patients with readmission to any New York hospital were evaluated. Planned versus unplanned readmission rates were compared. Following univariate analysis, multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify risk factors for unplanned readmissions after accounting for baseline characteristics, comorbidities and complications.

resultsThere were 591,627 patients who underwent LC during the studied time period. Overall 30-day readmission rate was 4.94% (n = 29,245) and unplanned 30-days readmission rate was 4.58% (n = 27,084). Female patients were less likely to have 30-day unplanned readmissions. Patients with age older than 65 or younger than 29 were more likely to have 30-day unplanned readmissions compared to patients with age 30-44 or 45-64. Insurance status was also significant, as patients with Medicaid/Medicare were more likely to have unplanned readmissions compared to commercial insurance. In addition, variables such as Black race, presence of any comorbidity, postoperative complication, and prolonged initial hospital length of stay were associated with subsequent readmission.

conclusionThis data show that readmissions rates following LC are relatively low; however, majority of readmissions are unplanned. Most common reason for unplanned readmissions was associated with complications of the procedure or medical care. By identifying certain risk groups, unplanned readmissions may be prevented.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicPatient ReadmissionAdultAgedFemaleHumansMedicareNew YorkPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsUnited StatesCholecystectomyRates and causesReadmissions

Identifiers

PMID32875412
OpenAlexW3082716653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.