ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021
Prevalence of internal hernia following laparoscopic colorectal surgery: single-center report on 1300 patients.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel and simple technique to prevent internal hernias after laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resection: alignment and fixation of the proximal jejunum.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Article
- Risk factors of symptomatic internal hernias after left hemicolectomy: a multicenter retrospective study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Article
- Rare strangulated intenal hernia following extraperitoneal colostomy for rectal cancer operation: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2024Article
- Laparoscopic repair for internal hernia associated with colostomy: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2023Article
- Two cases of an internal hernia after laparoscopic sigmoid resection.BMJ case reports · 2022Article
- Internal hernia following laparoscopic anterior resection for cancer: higher prevalence than expected of an under-reported complication.International journal of colorectal disease · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInternal hernia (IH) is an infrequent complication following colorectal resection with minimally invasive technique. The real prevalence is difficult to define and there are only few large series reporting data on this complication, often focusing only on left-sided resections. Aim of the study was to evaluate the occurrence of IH following laparoscopic colorectal resection (LCR), reporting clinical presentation and treatment.
methodsData from 1297 patients undergoing elective LCR for cancer or benign disease in a 15-year period (June 2005-March 2020) were prospectively collected. A database query was performed to search for small bowel obstructions requiring reintervention.
resultsFive patients presented symptomatic IH (prevalence = 0.38%) and required reintervention. The preceding surgical procedure was left hemicolectomy for diverticular disease in all patients. The mesenteric defect had been originally closed in 4/5 patients. The median time interval between initial surgery and the occurrence of IH was 1 (range: 0.3-10) month. In all cases a small bowel loop was found herniating through the mesocolic defect. Small bowel resection was required in one patient only. The median hospital stay following reintervention was 7 (range: 4-17) days.
conclusionsIH following LCR is a rare but severe complication, potentially leading to death, if not promptly diagnosed and treated. Awareness of this complication, early recognition, and proper diagnostic and therapeutic management is mandatory allowing laparoscopic approach and often avoiding small bowel resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.