Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32875404›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2020

Precision Medicine for Breast Cancer Utilizing Circulating Tumor DNA: It Is in the Blood.

Emily Miller, Lee Schwartzberg

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 62% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily MillerUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Lee SchwartzbergUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA. lschwartzberg@westclinic.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7433-3428
University of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementLiquid biopsy using blood components to assess circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is rapidly becoming a new standard-of-care technology in many tumor types, including breast cancer, due to the potential to provide predictive and prognostic information. The minimally invasive and repeatable nature of plasma based mutational testing is appealing for patients and facilitates enhanced disease monitoring. It is important for the clinician to understand the benefits and limitations of this emerging assay and the potential applications in breast cancer. Multiple technologies have been employed to assess breast cancer ctDNA with high sensitivity and specificity leading to assays that have been useful in research trials and are entering widespread clinical application. ctDNA analysis of breast cancer is of clinical utility today in selecting targeted therapy for advanced breast cancer, most notably by assessing PIK3CA mutations in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative disease. It will be employed in the near future in a variety of clinical settings including early detection of primary breast cancer, minimal residual disease after initial therapy, and use in advanced breast cancer for prognosis, early identification of non-response, and monitoring genomic markers of resistance.

Indexed as

Precision MedicineBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCirculating Tumor DNAClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesClinical Decision-MakingEarly Detection of CancerErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansLiquid BiopsyMutationNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProgression-Free SurvivalReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneCirculating Tumor DNAClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesPIK3CA protein, humanReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneBreast cancerctDNAEarly detectionLiquid biopsyMinimal residual diseaseTargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID32875404
OpenAlexW3081703403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.