Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32875402›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2021

A psycholinguistic method for measuring coarticulation in child and adult speech.

Phil J Howson, Jeffrey E Kallay, Melissa A Redford

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Acquisition of Articulatory Timing for Liquids: Evidence From Child and Adult Speech.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Phil J HowsonDepartment of Linguistics, 1290 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA.
Jeffrey E KallayDepartment of Linguistics, 1290 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA.
Melissa A RedfordDepartment of Linguistics, 1290 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA. redford@uoregon.edu.
University of Oregon · US

Funding

Speech rhythm acquisitionR01HD087452 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI REDFORD, MELISSA A · 2017 to 2021
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD087452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A perceiver's ability to accurately predict target sounds in a forward-gated AV speech task indexes the strength and scope of anticipatory coarticulation in adult speech (Redford et al., JASA, 144, 2447-2461, 2018). This suggests a perception-based method for studying coarticulation in populations who may poorly tolerate the more invasive or restrictive techniques used to measure speech movements directly. But the use of perception to measure production begs the question of confounding influences on perceiver performance and thus on the reliability and generalizability of the proposed method. The present study was therefore designed to test whether a gated AV speech method for measuring coarticulation provides reliable results across different study populations (child versus adult), different task environments (in-lab versus online), and different coarticulatory directions (forward/anticipatory versus backward/carryover). The results indicated excellent measurement reliability across age groups in the forward/anticipatory measurement direction, though more perceivers are needed to achieve the same levels of agreement and consistency when the task is completed online. Accuracy was lower in the backward/carryover direction, and although agreement and consistency were still reasonably high across perceivers, the effect of age group differed between the laboratory and online environments, suggesting measurement error in one or both environments. Overall, the results support using in-lab or online perceptual judgments to measure anticipatory coarticulation in developmental studies of speech production. Further validation study is needed before the method can be extended to measure carryover coarticulation.

Indexed as

SpeechSpeech PerceptionAdultChildHumansPhoneticsPsycholinguisticsReproducibility of ResultsSpeech AcousticsSpeech Production MeasurementAV speech perceptionGating paradigmOnline perception taskSpeech production

Identifiers

PMID32875402
PMCPMC7917154
OpenAlexW3081764447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.