Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32875379›Full record

ArticleHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2020

[Current status of cardiac electrophysiology training in Germany].

Kevin Willy, Patrick Müller, Lars Eckardt, David Duncker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Beyond the badge: quantitative insights of skill gaps in licensed early-career cardiac device implanters and evidence-based pathways to proficiency.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Article
  2. [Compatibility of family and cardiac electrophysiology].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. [Digital competence in rhythmology : Training and education].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2024
    Review
  5. 10-year follow-up of interventional electrophysiology: updated German survey during the COVID-19 pandemic.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2023
    Article
  6. [Starting cardiac electrophysiology-practical guidance].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kevin WillyKlinik für Kardiologie II - Rhythmologie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, 48149, Münster, Deutschland.
Patrick MüllerKlinik für Kardiologie II - Rhythmologie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, 48149, Münster, Deutschland. Patrick.Mueller@ukmuenster.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1641-5449
Lars EckardtKlinik für Kardiologie II - Rhythmologie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, 48149, Münster, Deutschland.
David DunckerHannover Herzrhythmus Centrum, Klinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac electrophysiology training of young cardiologists forms the foundation of optimal heart rhythm patient care. In particular, cardiac electrophysiology is characterized by continuous innovation and has progressed rapidly over the last few years. This may have led to a gap between clinical training and the new technologies and could significantly change training requirements.

objectiveThe aim of the survey was to obtain the opinion of young cardiologists about the current importance and satisfaction of cardiac electrophysiology training and to identify areas for improvement.

methodsThe survey was conducted in May 2020. Young DGK (Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie, German Society for Cardiology) members were contacted via e‑mail and asked to answer an online-based questionnaire. The questionnaire containing information about the current status, satisfaction, and structures of educational and clinical proficiency of cardiac electrophysiology in Germany.

resultsOverall, 131 young DGK members completed the survey. Mean age was 33 ± 3.3 years and 68% of the participants were male. Among the participants, 64% were cardiology fellows, while 36% were qualified. A total of 72 participants (53%) reported overall satisfaction with their clinical training and 50% of the participants held the opinion that cardiac electrophysiology should become a larger part of their education. Training courses and fellowships were rated mostly positive (70% vs. 93%, respectively); however, the later were unknown to 41% of the participants. Areas identified for improvement included the following: establishment of general cardiac electrophysiology rotation; enabling access to procedures to gain invasive skills; increased advertising for training courses and fellowships; increase of online-based training courses.

conclusionThe survey underlines the interest of young cardiologists in an intensified cardiac electrophysiology training within their cardiology training.

Indexed as

CardiologyElectrophysiologic Techniques, CardiacAdultCardiac ElectrophysiologyGermanyHumansMaleCardiovascular trainingFellowshipMedical trainingSpecialist training

Identifiers

PMID32875379
PMCPMC7462106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.