Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32875365›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2020

Microbiome of root vegetables-a source of gluten-degrading bacteria.

Viia Kõiv, Kaarel Adamberg, Signe Adamberg, Ingrid Sumeri, Sergo Kasvandik, Veljo Kisand, Ülo Maiväli, Tanel Tenson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Gluten-degrading bacteria: availability and applications.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Viia KõivInstitute of Technology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia. viia.koiv@ut.ee.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9044-0971
Kaarel AdambergSchool of Science: Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7203-925X
Signe AdambergSchool of Science: Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8198-1618
Ingrid SumeriCenter of Food and Fermentation Technologies, Tallinn, Estonia.
Sergo KasvandikInstitute of Technology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0218-2410
Veljo KisandInstitute of Technology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5535-1639
Ülo MaiväliInstitute of Technology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8035-6896
Tanel TensonInstitute of Technology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0260-3601
University of Tartu · EETallinn University of Technology · EE

Funding

Eesti Teadusagentuur PRG335European Regional Development Fund 2014-2020.4.01.15-0013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gluten is a cereal protein that is incompletely digested by human proteolytic enzymes that create immunogenic peptides that accumulate in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Although both environmental and human bacteria have been shown to expedite gluten hydrolysis, gluten intolerance is a growing concern. Here we hypothesize that together with food, we acquire environmental bacteria that could impact our GIT with gluten-degrading bacteria. Using in vitro gastrointestinal simulation conditions, we evaluated the capacity of endophytic bacteria that inhabit root vegetables, potato (Solanum tuberosum), carrot (Daucus sativus), beet (Beta vulgaris), and topinambur (Jerusalem artichoke) (Helianthus tuberosus), to resist these conditions and degrade gluten. By 16S rDNA sequencing, we discovered that bacteria from the families Enterobacteriaceae, Bacillaceae, and Clostridiaceae most effectively multiply in conditions similar to the human GIT (microoxic conditions, 37 °C) while utilizing vegetable material and gluten as nutrients. Additionally, we used stomach simulation (1 h, pH 3) and intestinal simulation (1 h, bile salts 0.4%) treatments. The bacteria that survived this treatment retained the ability to degrade gluten epitopes but at lower levels. Four bacterial strains belonging to species Bacillus pumilus, Clostridium subterminale, and Clostridium sporogenes isolated from vegetable roots produced proteases with postproline cleaving activity that successfully neutralized the toxic immunogenic epitopes. KEY POINTS: • Bacteria from root vegetables can degrade gluten. • Some of these bacteria can resist conditions mimicking gastrointestinal tract.

Indexed as

Celiac DiseaseHelianthusMicrobiotaBacteriaClostridiumGliadinGlutensHumansVegetablesGliadinGlutensCeliac diseaseELISAFoodProlyl endopeptidaseRoot vegetable

Identifiers

PMID32875365
PMCPMC7502452
OpenAlexW3081690652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.