Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32875289›Full record

ArticleToxicon: X2020

High clinician- and patient-reported satisfaction with individualized onabotulinumtoxinA treatment for spasticity across several etiologies from the ASPIRE study.

Gerard E Francisco, Daniel S Bandari, Ganesh Bavikatte, Wolfgang H Jost, Emily McCusker, Joan Largent, Aleksej Zuzek, Alberto Esquenazi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicon: X, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01930786 (ASPIRE), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01930786 completednot on this map

ASPIRE: Adult SPasticity International REgistry on BOTOX® Treatment

TypeobservationalSponsorAllerganRan2013 to 2017Enrolled744ConditionsMuscle SpasticityArmsonabotulinumtoxinA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. The use of botulinum toxin for spasticity in people with spinal cord injury: a scoping review.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Gerard E FranciscoThe University of Texas Health Science Center McGovern Medical School and TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston, TX, USA.
Daniel S BandariMultiple Sclerosis Center of California & Research Group, Newport Beach, CA, USA.
Ganesh BavikatteThe Walton Centre, Liverpool, UK.
Wolfgang H JostUniversity of Freiburg, Department of Neurology, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Emily McCuskerAllergan, an AbbVie Company, Irvine, CA, USA.
Joan LargentIQVIA Real-World Evidence Solutions, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Aleksej ZuzekAllergan, an AbbVie Company, Irvine, CA, USA.
Alberto EsquenaziMossRehab Gait and Motion Analysis Laboratory, Elkins Park, PA, USA.
AbbVie (United States) · USAllergan (United States) · USIQVIA (United States) · USMoss Rehabilitation Hospital · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of Freiburg · DEWalton Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Etiology-specific onabotulinumtoxinA utilization to manage spasticity is largely unknown. In this 1-year interim analysis, we evaluated real-world onabotulinumtoxinA utilization and effectiveness across several etiologies from the Adult Spasticity International Registry (ASPIRE) study. ASPIRE is a multicenter, prospective, observational registry (NCT01930786) examining stroke, multiple sclerosis [MS], cerebral palsy [CP], traumatic brain injury [TBI], and spinal cord injury [SCI] patients with spasticity treated with onabotulinumtoxinA at the clinician's discretion. Assessments included onabotulinumtoxinA utilization (each session), clinician (subsequent session)/patient (5±1 weeks post-treatment) satisfaction, and the Disability Assessment Scale (DAS; subsequent session). 730 patients received ≥1 onabotulinumtoxinA treatment, with 37% naïve to botulinum toxin(s) for spasticity. The most common etiology was stroke (n=411, 56%), followed by MS (N=119, 16%), CP (N=77, 11%), TBI (N=45, 6%), and SCI (N=42, 6%). The total body mean cumulative dose (±SD) of onabotulinumtoxinA per session ranged from 296 U (±145) in CP to 406 U (±152) in TBI. The most commonly treated upper limb presentations were clenched fist (stroke, MS, and SCI), flexed wrist (CP), and flexed elbow (TBI). Equinovarus foot was the most commonly treated lower limb presentation in all etiologies. Stroke patients showed improved DAS scores for nearly all subscales in both limbs, indicative of improved global function. All etiologies showed improved lower limb mobility DAS scores. Across all sessions, clinicians (range: 87.4% [SCI]-94.2% [CP]) and patients (range: 67.6% [TBI]-89.7% [SCI]) reported extreme satisfaction/satisfaction that onabotulinumtoxinA helped manage spasticity, and clinicians (range: 94.6% [TBI]-98.8% [CP]) and patients (range: 88.4% [stroke]-91.2% [TBI]) would definitely/probably continue treatment. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and treatment-related serious adverse events (TRSAEs) were reported as follows: stroke: 10 TRAEs (2.2% patients), 3 TRSAEs (0.5%); MS: 5 TRAEs (4.2%), 0 TRSAEs; CP: 0 TRAEs, 0 TRSAEs; TBI: 1 TRAEs (2.2%), 0 TRSAEs; SCI: 0 TRAEs, 0 TRSAEs. No new safety signals were identified. High clinician- and patient-reported satisfaction were observed following individualized onabotulinumtoxinA treatment, as well as improved global function. Interim results from ASPIRE demonstrate etiology-specific similarities and differences in clinical approaches to manage spasticity.

Indexed as

Botulinum toxinsCerebral palsyCerebrovascular accidentDisability evaluationElectrical stimulationElectromyographyMultiple sclerosisMuscle spasticityPatient reported outcome measuresSpinal cord injuriesStrokeTraumatic brain injuryType AUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID32875289
PMCPMC7452133
OpenAlexW3033500788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.