Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32875281›Full record

ArticleGates open research2020

Models of service delivery for optimizing a patient's first six months on antiretroviral therapy for HIV: an applied research agenda.

Sydney Rosen, Anna Grimsrud, Peter Ehrenkranz, Ingrid Katz

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gates open research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05454839 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Preferences for Services in a Patient's First Six Months on Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV in South Africa

TypeobservationalSponsorBoston UniversityRan2022 to 2026Enrolled1,098ConditionsHIVArmsSurvey, Focus group
NCT05454852 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Preferences for Services in a Patient's First Six Months on Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV in Zambia

TypeobservationalSponsorBoston UniversityRan2022 to 2026Enrolled771ConditionsHIVArmsSurvey, Focus group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sydney RosenSchool of Public Health, Boston University, 801 Massachusetts Ave, 3rd fl, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6560-2964
Anna GrimsrudHIV Programmes & Advocacy, International AIDS Society, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1199-8377
Peter EhrenkranzBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2028-4779
Ingrid KatzDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Standing Tall - A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Community-Based Intervention to Improve Health Outcomes for Newly Diagnosed HIV-Positive Young Adults in South AfricaR34MH114897 · NIMH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KATZ, INGRID T. · 2018 to 2021
$925k
NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH114897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differentiated models of service delivery (DSD models) for HIV treatment in sub-Saharan Africa were conceived as a way to manage rapidly expanding populations of experienced patients who are clinically "stable" on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Entry requirements for most models include at least six months on treatment and a suppressed viral load. These models thus systematically exclude newly-initiated patients, who instead experience the conventional model of care, which requires frequent, multiple clinic visits that impose costs on both providers and patients. In this open letter, we argue that the conventional model of care for the first six months on ART is no longer adequate. The highest rates of treatment discontinuation are in the first six-month period after treatment initiation. Newly initiating patients are generally healthier than in the past, with higher CD4 counts, and antiretroviral medications are better tolerated, with fewer side effects and substitutions, making extra clinic visits unnecessary. Improvements in the treatment initiation process, such as same-day initiation, have not been followed by innovations in the early treatment period. Finally, the advent of COVID-19 has made it riskier to require multiple clinic visits. Research to develop differentiated models of care for the first six-month period is needed. Priorities include estimating the minimum number and type of provider interactions and ART education needed, optimizing the timing of a patient's first viral load test, determining when lay providers can replace clinicians, ensuring that patients have sufficient but not burdensome access to support, and identifying ways to establish a habit of lifelong adherence.

Indexed as

Africaantiretroviral therapydifferentiated modelsHIVretention

Identifiers

PMID32875281
PMCPMC7445417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.