ReviewACS omega2020
Genome Editing for Resistance to Insect Pests: An Emerging Tool for Crop Improvement.
Review in ACS omega, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.
- Breeding jassid-resistant okra (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Plant Biotic Stress: Tools and Techniques for Crop Protection.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Insect Pest Control from Chemical to Biotechnological Approach: Constrains and Challenges.Insects · 2025Review
- Establishing a CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing framework in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) by targeting phytoene desaturase (PDS) gene disruption.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Host-Delivered RNA Interference for Durable Pest Resistance in Plants: Advanced Methods, Challenges, and Applications.Molecular biotechnology · 2024Review
- CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing technique to control fall armyworm (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024Review
- Genetic Engineering for Enhancing Sugarcane Tolerance to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Review
- Putative target sites in synganglion for novel ixodid tick control strategies.Ticks and tick-borne diseases · 2023Review
- CRISPR/Cas9: an advanced platform for root and tuber crops improvement.Frontiers in genome editing · 2023Review
- Extraction of soybean plant trait parameters based on SfM-MVS algorithm combined with GRNN.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Molecular mechanisms, genetic mapping, and genome editing for insect pest resistance in field crops.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022Review
- Perspectives for integrated insect pest protection in oilseed rape breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022Review
- Reactive oxygen species in plants: an invincible fulcrum for biotic stress mitigation.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Genetic Resources of Cereal Crops for Aphid Resistance.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- VIGE: virus-induced genome editing for improving abiotic and biotic stress traits in plants.Stress biology · 2022Review
- Molecular and Computational Strategies to Increase the Efficiency of CRISPR-Based Techniques.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Biotechnological Road Map for Innovative Weed Management.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Insight into aphid mediatedFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Advances in Editing Silkworms (Insects · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plants are challenged incessantly by several biotic and abiotic stresses during their entire growth period. As with other biotic stress factors, insect pests have also posed serious concerns related to yield losses due to which agricultural productivity is at stake. In plants, trait modification for crop improvement was initiated with breeding approaches followed by genetic engineering. However, stringent regulatory policies for risk assessment and lack of social acceptance for genetically modified crops worldwide have incited researchers toward alternate strategies. Genome engineering or genome editing has emerged as a new breeding technique with the ability to edit the genomes of plants, animals, microbes, and human beings. Several gene editing strategies are being executed with continuous emergence of variants. The scientific community has unraveled the utility of various editing tools from endonucleases to CRISPR/Cas in several aspects related to plant growth, development, and mitigation of stresses. The categorical focus on the development of tools and techniques including designing of binary vectors to facilitate ease in genome engineering are being pursued. Through this Review, we embark upon the conglomeration of various genome editing strategies that can be and are being used to design insect pest resistance in plants. Case studies and novel crop-based approaches that reiterate the successful use of these tools in insects as well as in plants are highlighted. Further, the Review also provides implications for the requirement of a specific regulatory framework and risk assessment of the edited crops. Genome editing toward insect pest management is here to stay, provided uncompromising efforts are made toward the identification of amiable target genes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.