Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32875083›Full record

ArticleACS central science2020

Machine Learning to Reveal Nanoparticle Dynamics from Liquid-Phase TEM Videos.

Lehan Yao, Zihao Ou, Binbin Luo, Cong Xu, Qian Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS central science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Mineral dissolution by dimeric complexes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Intelligent Systems for Inorganic Nanomaterial Synthesis.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lehan YaoDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Materials Research Laboratory, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, and Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.
Zihao OuDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Materials Research Laboratory, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, and Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.
Binbin LuoDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Materials Research Laboratory, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, and Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.
Cong XuDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Materials Research Laboratory, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, and Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.
Qian ChenDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Materials Research Laboratory, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, and Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid-phase transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has been recently applied to materials chemistry to gain fundamental understanding of various reaction and phase transition dynamics at nanometer resolution. However, quantitative extraction of physical and chemical parameters from the liquid-phase TEM videos remains bottlenecked by the lack of automated analysis methods compatible with the videos' high noisiness and spatial heterogeneity. Here, we integrate, for the first time, liquid-phase TEM imaging with our customized analysis framework based on a machine learning model called U-Net neural network. This combination is made possible by our workflow to generate simulated TEM images as the training data with well-defined ground truth. We apply this framework to three typical systems of colloidal nanoparticles, concerning their diffusion and interaction, reaction kinetics, and assembly dynamics, all resolved in real-time and real-space by liquid-phase TEM. A diversity of properties for differently shaped anisotropic nanoparticles are mapped, including the anisotropic interaction landscape of nanoprisms, curvature-dependent and staged etching profiles of nanorods, and an unexpected kinetic law of first-order chaining assembly of concave nanocubes. These systems representing properties at the nanoscale are otherwise experimentally inaccessible. Compared to the prevalent image segmentation methods, U-Net shows a superior capability to predict the position and shape boundary of nanoparticles from highly noisy and fluctuating background-a challenge common and sometimes inevitable in liquid-phase TEM videos. We expect our framework to push the potency of liquid-phase TEM to its full quantitative level and to shed insights, in high-throughput and statistically significant fashion, on the nanoscale dynamics of synthetic and biological nanomaterials.

Identifiers

PMID32875083
PMCPMC7453571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.