Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32875057›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2020

Sex differences in memory clinic patients with possible vascular cognitive impairment.

Lieza G Exalto, Jooske M F Boomsma, Rosha Babapour Mofrad, Frederik Barkhof, Onno N Groeneveld, Rutger Heinen, Hugo J Kuijf, Anna E Leeuwis, Niels D Prins, Geert Jan Biessels and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Non-hemorrhagic imaging markers of cerebral amyloid angiopathy in memory clinic patients.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Gastrodin and Vascular Dementia: Advances and Current Perspectives.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lieza G ExaltoDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht Universiteit Utrecht the Netherlands.
Jooske M F BoomsmaDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht Universiteit Utrecht the Netherlands.
Rosha Babapour MofradAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam the Netherlands.
Frederik BarkhofDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam the Netherlands.
Onno N GroeneveldDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht Universiteit Utrecht the Netherlands.
Rutger HeinenDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht Universiteit Utrecht the Netherlands.
Hugo J KuijfImage Sciences Institute University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht the Netherlands.
Anna E LeeuwisAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam the Netherlands.
Niels D PrinsAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam the Netherlands.
Geert Jan BiesselsDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht Universiteit Utrecht the Netherlands.
Wiesje M Vd FlierAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam the Netherlands.
TRACE‐VCI study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe aimed to establish sex differences in vascular brain damage of memory clinic patients with possible vascular cognitive impairment (VCI).

methodsA total of 860 memory clinic patients (aged 67.7 ± 8.5; 46% female) with cognitive complaints and vascular brain damage (ie, possible VCI) from the prospective TRACE-VCI (Utrecht-Amsterdam Clinical Features and Prognosis in Vascular Cognitive Impairment) cohort study with 2-year follow-up were included. Age-adjusted female-to-male differences were calculated with general linear models, for demographic variables, vascular risk factors, clinical diagnosis, cognitive performance, and brain magnetic resonance imaging markers.

resultsWe found no difference in age nor distribution of clinical diagnoses between females and males. Females performed worse on the MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination) and CAMCOG (Cognitive and Self-Contained Part of the Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly). Females had a larger white matter hyperintensity volume, while males more often showed (lacunar) infarcts. There was no difference in microbleed prevalence. Males had smaller normalized total brain and gray matter volumes. During follow-up, occurrence of cognitive decline and institutionalization was comparable, but mortality was higher in males. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that susceptibility and underlying etiology of VCI might differ by sex. Males seem to have more large vessel brain damage compared to females that have more small vessel brain damage.

Indexed as

CAMCOGinfarctsmicrobleedsMMSEmortalitysex differencesvascular cognitive impairmentwhite matter hyperinensities

Identifiers

PMID32875057
PMCPMC7447910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.