Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32875050›Full record

ArticleSSM - population health2020

Paid sex among men in sub-Saharan Africa: Analysis of the demographic and health survey.

Abdul-Aziz Seidu, Eugene Kofuor Maafo Darteh, Akwasi Kumi-Kyereme, Kwamena Sekyi Dickson, Bright Opoku Ahinkorah

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM - population health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abdul-Aziz SeiduDepartment of Population and Health, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.
Eugene Kofuor Maafo DartehDepartment of Population and Health, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.
Akwasi Kumi-KyeremeDepartment of Population and Health, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.
Kwamena Sekyi DicksonDepartment of Population and Health, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.
Bright Opoku AhinkorahThe Australian Centre for Public and Population Health Research (ACPPHR), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPaying for sex is regarded as a risky sexual behavior (RSB) among heterosexual men. Men paying for sex are considered to be a bridging population for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Despite the link between paid sex and sexual and reproductive health outcomes such as STIs, little is known about the prevalence and factors associated with paid sex among men in sub-Saharan Africa. This study examined the prevalence of paid sex and the socio-demographic factors associated with it among men in sub-Saharan Africa.

methodsThe study made use of pooled data from the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) conducted from January 1, 2010 to December 3, 2016 in 27 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Binary and multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate the relationship between the explanatory and the outcome variables.

resultsThe results of the study showed that of the 139,427 men who participated in the study, 4.3% reported they had paid for sex in the 12 months preceding the survey. Men in Mozambique had the highest proportion (13.6%) of paying for sex in the 12 months preceding the survey. The results of the multivariable analysis indicated that men from DR Congo [AOR = 9.74; 95% CI = 7.45-12.73], men who had completed only primary level of education [AOR = 1.31; 95% CI = 1.18-1.45], men aged 25-34 years [AOR = 2.84; 95% CI = 2.26-3.56], men belonging to "other" religious groups [AOR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.09-1.32] and men who were employed [AOR = 1.73; 95% CI = 1.58-1.90] had higher odds of paying for sex. Men who were divorced [AOR = 4.52; 95% = 3.89-5.25], men who read newspaper/magazine almost every day [AOR = 1.34; 95% CI = 1.12-1.63], men who listened to radio almost every day [AOR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.05-1.36] and men who watched television at least once a week [AOR = 1.10; 95% CI = 1.01-1.19] also had higher odds of paying for sex. On the other hand, men in rural areas [AOR = 0.88; 95%CI = 0.82-0.95], men in the richest wealth quintile [AOR = 0.83; 95%CI = 0.74-0.93] and those with tertiary level of education [AOR = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.65-0.90] had lower odds of paying for sex.

conclusionThe odds of paid sex were high among men with only primary level of education, men aged 25-34, men who professed 'other' religious affiliation, men who are employed and men who are divorced. However, paid sex was low among men in the richest wealth quintile, men with tertiary level of education and men living in rural areas. This means that the decision to pay for sex is influenced by several social and demographic factors. Hence, these factors should be taken into consideration for sexual and reproductive health interventions and services. Policy and interventional measures should aim at reducing high-risk behavior of men who pay for sex.

Indexed as

MenPaid sexSTIsSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID32875050
PMCPMC7451820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.