ArticleArthroplasty today2020
Morphology of the Greater Trochanter: An Assessment of Anatomic Variation and Canal Overhang.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comprehensive analysis on contributing factors for varus or valgus malposition of femoral stems in uncemented total hip arthroplasty via DAA.Journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Greater trochanter morphology and association with patient demographics, surgical factors, and post-operative stem position: a retrospective assessment of 150 cementless THRs in 135 dogs.BMC veterinary research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVarus malposition is a risk of early failure in total hip arthroplasty. The degree to which the tip of the greater trochanter (GT) overhangs the canal can increase this risk. Although we know proximal femoral anatomy is variable, no study has addressed variations in medial overhang of the GT on plain radiographs.
methodsAll low anteroposterior pelvis radiographs more than 1 year were reviewed 3 times by 2 orthopaedic surgeons and one radiologist. The canal width (CW) was measured 10 cm below the lesser trochanter. Canal overhang (CO) was defined by the distance between the lateral medullary canal and a parallel line beginning at the most medial aspect of the GT. The overhang index (OI) is defined as the percentage of the canal overhung by the GT.
resultsThe mean CW was 13.5 mm, mean CO 16.4 mm, and mean OI 1.22. Hips were then classified as the following: (A) OI < 0.5 (n = 8), (B) OI 0.5-1.0 (n = 78), (C) OI 1.0-1.5 (n = 191), and (D) OI > 1.5 (n = 68). Intraobserver reliability was excellent for all measures: 0.89 (confidence interval: 0.87-0.91) for CW, 0.96 (0.95-0.97) for CO, and 0.97 (0.97-0.98) for OI. Interobserver reliability was good for CW 0.75 (0.70-0.79) and excellent for CO 0.90 (0.88-0.92) and OI 0.95 (0.94-0.96).
conclusionsVariations in the morphology of the proximal femur can predispose to varus component malposition. The degree to which the GT overhangs the canal can be quantified and classified based on plain films. This can aid in preoperative planning and help guide intraoperative proximal femoral preparation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.