Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32874934›Full record

ArticleAnnals of global health2020

Practical and Ethical Solutions for Remote Applied Learning Experiences in Global Health.

Anna Kalbarczyk, Meagan Harrison, Maria Cecilia Dedios Sanguineti, Juddy Wachira, Carlos A Faerron Guzman, Bhakti Hansoti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Virtual global health in graduate medical education: a systematic review.International journal of medical education · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna KalbarczykJohns Hopkins University, Johns Hopkins Center for Global Health, Baltimore, MD, US.
Meagan HarrisonJohns Hopkins University, Johns Hopkins Center for Global Health, Baltimore, MD, US.
Maria Cecilia Dedios SanguinetiUniversidad de los Andes, School of Government, Bogota, CO.
Juddy WachiraDepartment of Mental Health and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Moi University, Eldoret, KE.
Carlos A Faerron GuzmanInterAmerican Center for Global Health, CR.
Bhakti HansotiJohns Hopkins University, Johns Hopkins Center for Global Health, Baltimore, MD, US.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global health trainees rely on immersive experiences to apply their classroom knowledge in real-world settings. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic travel has come to a halt and short-term experiences are no longer available in their current form. As with didactic material, global health programs have an opportunity to innovate the delivery of applied learning, providing trainees with robust, mentored experiences that promote the acquisition of core global health competencies. We provide a series of practical solutions for remote applied learning including case-based learning, pathfinder pedagogy, virtual reality simulations, and twinning. We further describe the role of these approaches in addressing common criticisms of short-term experiences and their potential for creating new win-win dynamics between institutions and trainees.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsEducation, DistancePandemicsPneumonia, ViralProblem-Based LearningBetacoronavirusCOVID-19EducationGlobal HealthHumansOrganizational InnovationSARS-CoV-2Teaching

Identifiers

PMID32874934
PMCPMC7442166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.