ArticleToxicology reports2020
Predicting PBT and CMR properties of substances of very high concern (SVHCs) using QSAR models, and application for K-REACH.
Article in Toxicology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review on Predictive Models and Integration Strategies for Holistic Impact Assessment of Chemicals and Materials.Environmental science & technology · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- Comprehensive Ecotoxicity Studies on Quaternary Ammonium Salts Synthesized from Vitamin BPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A QSAR-ICE-SSD Model Prediction of the PNECs for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances and Their Ecological Risks in an Area of Electroplating Factories.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models have been applied to predict a variety of toxicity endpoints. Their performance needs to be validated, in a variety of cases, to increase their applicability to chemical regulation. Using the data set of substances of very high concern (SVHCs), the performance of QSAR models were evaluated to predict the persistence and bioaccumulation of PBT, and the carcinogenicity and mutagenicity of CMR. BIOWIN and Toxtree showed higher sensitivity than other QSAR models - the former for persistence and bioaccumulation, the latter for carcinogenicity. In terms of mutagenicity, the sensitivities of QSAR models were underestimated, Toxtree was more accurate and specific than lazy structure-activity relationships (LAZARs) and Computer Assisted Evaluation of industrial chemical Substances According to Regulations (CAESAR). Using the weight of evidence (WoE) approach, which integrates results of individual QSAR models, enhanced the sensitivity of each toxicity endpoint. On the basis of obtained results, in particular the prediction of persistence and bioaccumulation by KOWWIN, a conservative criterion is recommended of log Kow greater than 4.5 in K-REACH, without an upper limit. This study suggests that reliable production of toxicity data by QSAR models is facilitated by a better understanding of the performance of these models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.