Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32874908›Full record

ArticleRespiratory medicine case reports2020

Enigma of pulmonary hypertension; echocardiography in the crossroads.

Debasish Roychoudhury, Kenneth Sha, Navin C Nanda, Gregory Gustafson

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory medicine case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Debasish RoychoudhuryNYP Queens Hospital, United States.
Kenneth ShaNYP Queens Hospital, United States.
Navin C NandaUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, United States.
Gregory GustafsonNYP Queens Hospital, United States.
New York Hospital Queens · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) with its myriad presentations provides a challenge in its diagnosis and management. Recent WHO classification of pulmonary hypertension as defined at the 5th World Symposium held in Nice, France in 2013 tries to highlight different forms of pulmonary hypertension based on different pathophysiology, clinical presentation and therapeutic strategies [1]. These are classified in 5 groups as follows (1): PAH, (2) PH due to left heart disease, (3) PH due to chronic lung disease and/or hypoxia, (4) chronic thromboembolic PH (CTEPH), and (5) PH due to unclear or multifactorial mechanism. In clinical practice we encounter patients with pulmonary hypertension which is often very difficult to diagnose accurately and therefore presents with therapeutic challenge. Echocardiography plays a vital role in diagnosis and management of this enigmatic disease entity. Due to the complex nature of the disease, there can be some overlaps in various groups of pulmonary hypertension. This is particularly true about the two groups according to WHO classification-pulmonary arterial hypertension (WHO group 1) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (WHO group 3). As clinicians we are often faced with the dilemma of making the correct diagnosis and echocardiography plays a pivotal role in this crossroad. We want to present two cases of pulmonary hypertension with different etiologies as stated above and review literature to elucidate the role of echocardiogram in these cases.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyPulmonary hypertensionWHO classification

Identifiers

PMID32874908
PMCPMC7452039
OpenAlexW3047497532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.