Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32874867›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical ultrasound

Utility of Ultrasound Elastography to Differentiate Benign from Malignant Cervical Lymph Nodes.

Vikrant Kanagaraju, A V B Rakshith, B Devanand, R Rajakumar

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vikrant KanagarajuDepartment of Radiology, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
A V B RakshithDepartment of Radiology, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
B DevanandDepartment of Radiology, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
R RajakumarDepartment of Radiology, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
PSG Institute of Medical Sciences & Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of strain elastography and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging in the differentiation of benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes (LNs). MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this prospective study, 50 enlarged cervical LNs (33 benign and 17 malignant) were examined by B-mode ultrasound (US), color Doppler, and strain elastography. Elastographic patterns (1-5) were categorized based on distribution of hard area within LN. The shear wave velocity (SWV) of LNs was evaluated by ARFI imaging. Diagnostic performance of sonoelastographic parameters was compared taking histopathology of LN as a reference standard. Optimal cutoff value of the mean SWV values for predicting malignancy was determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

resultsAmong US parameters, borders of LN had the highest diagnostic accuracy (80%), while echogenicity had the least (48%). Majority of benign LNs (

conclusionElastography has high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating benign and malignant cervical LNs and can be potentially useful in selecting the LN with high probability of malignancy, on which fine-needle aspiration cytology/biopsy can be performed.

Indexed as

Acoustic radiation force impulse imagingelastographylymph nodesultrasound

Identifiers

PMID32874867
PMCPMC7446693
OpenAlexW2994914402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.