Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32874776›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

Uncovering the microbiome of invasive sympatric European brown hares and European rabbits in Australia.

Somasundhari Shanmuganandam, Yiheng Hu, Tanja Strive, Benjamin Schwessinger, Robyn N Hall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. We and herbivores eat endophytes.Microbial biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Somasundhari ShanmuganandamResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8531-4006
Yiheng HuResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6513-9834
Tanja StriveHealth & Biosecurity, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Acton, ACT, Australia.
Benjamin SchwessingerResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7194-2922
Robyn N HallHealth & Biosecurity, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Acton, ACT, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5836-2990
Australian National University · AUCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEuropean brown hares (

methodsWe analysed the faecal microbiome of nine wild hares and twelve wild rabbits from a sympatric periurban reserve in Canberra, Australia, using a 16S rRNA amplicon-based sequencing approach. Additionally, we compared the concordance between results from Illumina and Nanopore sequencing platforms.

resultsWe identified significantly more variation in faecal microbiome composition between individual rabbits compared to hares, despite both species occupying a similar habitat. The faecal microbiome in both species was dominated by the phyla

Indexed as

16S rRNAIlluminaInvasive speciesLagomorphsMicrobiomeNanopore

Identifiers

PMID32874776
PMCPMC7441920
OpenAlexW3079751938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.