ArticlePeerJ2020
Exploring the classification of cancer cell lines from multiple omic views.
Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- From Omics to Multi-Omics Approaches for In-Depth Analysis of the Molecular Mechanisms of Prostate Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCancer classification is of great importance to understanding its pathogenesis, making diagnosis and developing treatment. The accumulation of extensive omics data of abundant cancer cell line provide basis for large scale classification of cancer with low cost. However, the reliability of cell lines as in vitro models of cancer has been controversial.
methodsIn this study, we explore the classification on pan-cancer cell line with single and integrated multiple omics data from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) database. The representative omics data of cancer, mRNA data, miRNA data, copy number variation data, DNA methylation data and reverse-phase protein array data were taken into the analysis. TumorMap web tool was used to illustrate the landscape of molecular classification.The molecular classification of patient samples was compared with cancer cell lines.
resultsEighteen molecular clusters were identified using integrated multiple omics clustering. Three pan-cancer clusters were found in integrated multiple omics clustering. By comparing with single omics clustering, we found that integrated clustering could capture both shared and complementary information from each omics data. Omics contribution analysis for clustering indicated that, although all the five omics data were of value, mRNA and proteomics data were particular important. While the classifications were generally consistent, samples from cancer patients were more diverse than cancer cell lines.
conclusionsThe clustering analysis based on integrated omics data provides a novel multi-dimensional map of cancer cell lines that can reflect the extent to pan-cancer cell lines represent primary tumors, and an approach to evaluate the importance of omic features in cancer classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.