Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32874709›Full record

ReviewSurgical neurology international2020

Neurosurgical management of perineural metastases: A case series and review of the literature.

John D Patterson, Matthew Helton, Mehdi Khani, Sehrish Sardar, Kevin Thomas, Edvaldo P Galhardo, Jose A Penagaricano, John D Day, Analiz Rodriguez

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical neurology international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 85% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

John D PattersonDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Matthew HeltonDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Mehdi KhaniDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Sehrish SardarDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Kevin ThomasDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Edvaldo P GalhardoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Jose A PenagaricanoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, United States.
John D DayDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Analiz RodriguezDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Kanazawa University · JPNeurological Surgery · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USStony Brook University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerineural invasion (PNI) and spread are one of the grimmest prognostic factors associated with primary skin and head-and-neck cancers, yet remain an often confused, and underreported, phenomenon. Adding complexity to reaching a diagnosis and treating perineural spread (PNS) is the finding that patients may have no known primary tumor, history of skin cancer, and/or incidental PNI in the primary tumor. These delays in diagnosis and treatment are further compounded by an already slow disease process and often require multidisciplinary care with combinations of stereotactic radiosurgery, surgical resection, and novel treatments such as checkpoint inhibitors.

methodsSix patients with metastatic cancer to the cranial nerves who underwent Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) treatment were chosen for retrospective analysis. This information included age, gender, any past surgeries (both stereotactic and regular surgery), dose of radiation and volume of the tumor treated in the GKRS, date of PNS, comorbidities, the patient follow-up, and pre- and post-GKRS imaging. The goal of the follow-up with radiographing imaging was to assess the efficacy of GKSS.

resultsThe clinical course of six patients with PNS is presented. Patients followed variable courses with mixed outcomes: two patients remain living, one was lost to follow-up, and three expired with a median survival of 12 months from date of diagnosis. Patients at our institution are ideally followed for life.

conclusionGiven the morbidity and mortality of PNS of cancer, time is limited, and further understanding is required to improve outcomes. Here, we provide a case series of patients with PNS treated with stereotactic radiosurgery, discuss their clinical courses, and review the known literature.

Indexed as

Head-and-neck cancerPerineural invasionPerineural spreadSkin cancerSkull base surgery

Identifiers

PMID32874709
PMCPMC7451152
OpenAlexW3045364526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.