Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32874647›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2020

Brain microRNAs among social and solitary bees.

Karen M Kapheim, Beryl M Jones, Eirik Søvik, Eckart Stolle, Robert M Waterhouse, Guy Bloch, Yehuda Ben-Shahar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Genome Evolution in Social Insects.Genome biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  3. The Evolution of Bees: Insights from 'Omic Studies.Genome biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  4. Epigenetic Mechanisms inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Karen M KapheimDepartment of Biology, Utah State University, 5305 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8140-7712
Beryl M JonesDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Eirik SøvikDepartment of Science and Mathematics, Volda University College, 6100 Volda, Norway.
Eckart StolleCentre of Molecular Biodiversity Research, Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
Robert M WaterhouseDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4199-9052
Guy BlochDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, The Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1624-4926
Yehuda Ben-ShaharDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63130, USA.
Hebrew University of Jerusalem · ILPrinceton University · USSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHUtah State University · USVolda University College · NOWashington University in St. Louis · USZoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary transitions to a social lifestyle in insects are associated with lineage-specific changes in gene expression, but the key nodes that drive these regulatory changes are unknown. We examined the relationship between social organization and lineage-specific microRNAs (miRNAs). Genome scans across 12 bee species showed that miRNA copy-number is mostly conserved and not associated with sociality. However, deep sequencing of small RNAs in six bee species revealed a substantial proportion (20-35%) of detected miRNAs had lineage-specific expression in the brain, 24-72% of which did not have homologues in other species. Lineage-specific miRNAs disproportionately target lineage-specific genes, and have lower expression levels than shared miRNAs. The predicted targets of lineage-specific miRNAs are not enriched for genes with caste-biased expression or genes under positive selection in social species. Together, these results suggest that novel miRNAs may coevolve with novel genes, and thus contribute to lineage-specific patterns of evolution in bees, but do not appear to have significant influence on social evolution. Our analyses also support the hypothesis that many new miRNAs are purged by selection due to deleterious effects on mRNA targets, and suggest genome structure is not as influential in regulating bee miRNA evolution as has been shown for mammalian miRNAs.

Indexed as

eusocialitygene regulationlineage-specificmicroRNA targetssmall non-coding RNA

Identifiers

PMID32874647
PMCPMC7428247
OpenAlexW3041514569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.