Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32874623›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2020

Introduced bees (

Anthony D Vaudo, David J Biddinger, Wiebke Sickel, Alexander Keller, Margarita M López-Uribe

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Pollen nutrition structures bee and plant community interactions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bee pollination services and the burden of biogeography.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Non-Native Non-Insects · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Introduced bees (Royal Society open science · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anthony D VaudoDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, NV 89557, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5268-5580
David J BiddingerFruit Research and Extension Center, The Pennsylvania State University, Biglerville, PA 17307, USA.
Wiebke SickelThünen Institute of Biodiversity, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Braunschweig 38116, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0038-1478
Alexander KellerDepartment of Bioinformatics, University of Würzburg, Center for Computational and Theoretical Biology, Würzburg 97074, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5716-3634
Margarita M López-UribeDepartment of Entomology, Center for Pollinator Research, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8185-2904

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studying the pollen preferences of introduced bees allows us to investigate how species use host-plants when establishing in new environments.

Indexed as

diet breadthhost specializationintroduced speciesmanaged pollinatorspollen metabarcodingpollination ecology

Identifiers

PMID32874623
PMCPMC7428236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.