Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32874241›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2020

Risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food.

EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM), Dieter Schrenk, Marguerita Bignami, Laurent Bodin, James Kevin Chipman, Jesús Del Mazo, Bettina Grasl-Kraupp, Christer Hogstrand, Laurentius Ron Hoogenboom, Jean-Charles Leblanc and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM)
Dieter Schrenk
Marguerita Bignami
Laurent Bodin
James Kevin Chipman
Jesús Del Mazo
Bettina Grasl-Kraupp
Christer Hogstrand
Laurentius Ron Hoogenboom
Jean-Charles Leblanc
Carlo Stefano Nebbia
Evangelia Ntzani
Annette Petersen
Salomon Sand
Tanja Schwerdtle
Christiane Vleminckx
Heather Wallace
Beat Brüschweiler
Pim Leonards
Martin Rose
Marco Binaglia
Zsuzsanna Horváth
Luisa Ramos Bordajandi
Elsa Nielsen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The European Commission asked EFSA for a scientific opinion on the risks for animal and human health related to the presence of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food. The data for experimental animals were reviewed and the CONTAM Panel identified the liver, kidney and thyroid as the target organs for the SCCP and MCCP mixtures tested in repeated dose toxicity studies. Decreased pup survival and subcutaneous haematoma/haemorrhage were also identified as critical effects for an MCCP mixture. For the LCCP mixtures tested, the liver was identified as the target organ. The Panel selected as reference points a BMDL

Indexed as

chlorinated paraffinsfeedfoodLCCPMCCPrisk assessmentSCCP

Identifiers

PMID32874241
PMCPMC7447893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.