Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32874209›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2020

Comparing real-world evidence among patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with liposomal irinotecan.

Jim Koeller, Andy Surinach, Steven R Arikian, Marko Zivkovic, Patrick Janeczko, Paul Cockrum, George Kim

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Management, Survival, and Costs of Pancreatic Cancer: Population-Based Observational Study in Catalonia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jim KoellerUniversity of Texas at Austin, Center for Pharmacoeconomic Studies, UTHSC, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive - MC 6220, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
Andy SurinachGenesis Research, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
Steven R ArikianGenesis Research, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
Marko ZivkovicGenesis Research, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
Patrick JaneczkoGenesis Research, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
Paul CockrumIpsen, Cambridge, MA, USA.
George KimDivision of Hematology and Oncology, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
George Washington University · USIpsen (United States) · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are questions surrounding the real-world effectiveness of chemotherapeutic treatments for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. This literature review compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes of available real-world evidence (RWE) for liposomal irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV), a treatment regimen indicated for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) who previously progressed on gemcitabine-based therapy. A targeted literature search was conducted in the PubMed Central® and Embase® databases to identify available RWE regarding patients with mPDAC receiving liposomal irinotecan published within the last 5 years (January 2014-September 2019). Data were extracted for prior lines of therapy, performance status, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of exposure, and adverse events. Six studies met inclusion criteria. A comparison of baseline patient characteristics and results with the included evidence reveals a clinically fragile, real-world patient population in terms of age (range: 61-68), prior lines of therapy with 34-61% of patients receiving ⩾2 lines of lines of prior therapy and performance status [49.8-100% of patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-1]. Studies observed wide OS (range: 5.3-9.4 months) and similar PFS (range: 2.3-4.1 months), with two studies measuring duration of exposure (7.3 weeks, 3.1 months). Patients analyzed by RWE studies tended to be older with significant disease progression, poor performance status, and more heavily pretreated compared with the phase III registrational trial (NAPOLI-1). Despite this, patients treated with liposomal irinotecan + 5-FU/LV therapy had similar outcomes as those in NAPOLI-1.

Indexed as

effectivenessliposomal irinotecanmetastatic pancreatic cancerreal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID32874209
PMCPMC7436779
OpenAlexW3063648724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.