Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32874190›Full record

ArticleClinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH2020

Implementing WHO-Quality Rights Project in Tunisia: Results of an Intervention at Razi Hospital.

Mauro Giovanni Carta, Rym Ghacem, Myriam Milka, Olfa Moula, Nidhal Staali, Uta Uali, Ghassene Bouakhari, Monica Mannu, Rym Refrafi, Souha Yaakoubi and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mauro Giovanni CartaDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Rym GhacemRazi Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
Myriam MilkaRazi Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
Olfa MoulaRazi Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
Nidhal StaaliRazi Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
Uta UaliRazi Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
Ghassene BouakhariRazi Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
Monica MannuDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Rym RefrafiMental Health Departement ,University Hospital Mongi Slim, Tunis, Tunisia.
Souha YaakoubiMental Health Departement ,University Hospital Mongi Slim, Tunis, Tunisia.
Maria Francesca MoroMailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Marie BaudelDepartment of Public Health, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Simon Vasseur-BacleWHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Lille, Lille, France.
Natalie DrewDepartment of Public Health, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Michelle FunkDepartment of Public Health, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Hôpital Razi de La Manouba · TNHôpital Mongi Slim · TNUniversity of Cagliari · ITColumbia University · US

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aims were: 1) to measure the attitudes of learners (and future trainers) before and after a course on WHO-Quality Rights (QR); 2) to evaluate a psychiatric ward, by previously trained staff on QR, comparing it with a previous evaluation and discussing an improvement plan.

methods1) Training sample: 19 subjects (8 males), 41.4±10.6 years, including jurists/lawyers, health professionals, and experts.The QR team developed the 26-item tool to assess the knowledge and attitudes of participants.2) Evaluation of quality of care and respect for human rights in the ward was carried out on 20 staff representatives, 20 family members and 20 users with QRToolkit.

results1) Learning in QR has partially changed the knowledge and attitudes of trained people.2) The evaluation shows significant delays in the implementation of the rights advocated by the United Nations Convention on the Human Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). In Themes 1, 3, 4 and 5, the evaluation shows no differences compared to 2014, but in Theme 2, the level was lower than four years before.

conclusionThe scarcity of resources due to the economic crisis that Tunisia is going through, cannot be considered the only cause of the delays highlighted. However, it is likely that in a context of uncertainty for the future, scarcity of resources and a decrease in staff (

Indexed as

Degrading treatmentDisabilitiesHuman rightsMental healthPsychosocial interventionWHO Quality rights project

Identifiers

PMID32874190
PMCPMC7431701
OpenAlexW4234293125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.