Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32874103›Full record

Trial reportJournal of sports science & medicine2020

Physiological Response Differences between Run and Cycle High Intensity Interval Training Program in Recreational Middle Age Female Runners.

Milos Mallol, Lynda Norton, David J Bentley, Gaizka Mejuto, Kevin Norton, Javier Yanci

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Milos MallolExercise Science, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, South Bedford Park, South Australia.
Lynda NortonExercise Science, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, South Bedford Park, South Australia.
David J BentleySchool of Environmental and Life Sciences Faculty of Science, University of Newcastle, Callaghan NSW, Australia.
Gaizka MejutoDepartment of Body Expression Didactics, University of the Basque Country, Sarriena Auzoa. Leioa, Spain.
Kevin NortonSchool of Health Sciences, City East Campus, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia.
Javier YanciDepartment of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Education and Sport, University of Basque Country (UPV-EHU), Portal de Lasarte Kalea, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to compare the changes in endurance running performance and physiological variables after a four-week period of high intensity interval training (HIIT) in either running or cycling in female athletes. Fourteen recreational female runners (age = 42 10 yr, height = 1.67 0.06 m, body mass = 61.6 10.4 kg, body mass index (BMI) = 22.2 3.4 kg.m

Indexed as

AdultBicyclingCreatine KinaseFemaleHeart RateHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingHumansLactic AcidMiddle AgedMuscle FatigueMyalgiaOxygen ConsumptionPerceptionPhysical EndurancePhysical ExertionRunningCreatine KinaseLactic Acidaerobic capacityendurancegenderintermittent trainingmuscle damage

Identifiers

PMID32874103
PMCPMC7429439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.