ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2020
Risk prediction platform for pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy using artificial intelligence.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postoperative pancreatic fistula: a bibliometric analysis of research trends and a meta-analysis on the association with intra pancreatic fat deposition.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- The role of artificial intelligence in pancreatic surgery: a systematic review.Updates in surgery · 2022Pooled it
- AI Trustworthiness in the Perioperative Period for Patients with Serious Illness: Scoping Narrative Review.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2026Article
- Retrospective investigation of risk factors for pancreatic fistula development after pancreaticoduodenectomy.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Virtual 3D models, augmented reality systems and virtual laparoscopic simulations in complicated pancreatic surgeries: state of art, future perspectives, and challenges.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Review
- The role of artificial intelligence in pancreatic surgery: Current and future perspectives.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2025Article
- Risk stratification of postoperative pancreatic fistula and other complications following pancreatoduodenectomy. How far are we? A scoping review.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- Advancements in postoperative pancreatic fistula: a comprehensive review of predictive factors, therapies, scoring systems and ongoing trials.eGastroenterology · 2025Review
- Role of Artificial Intelligence in Nanomedicine and Organ-specific Therapy: An Updated Review.Current drug targets · 2025Review
- Risk prediction of cholangitis after stent implantation based on machine learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: a narrative review.Updates in surgery · 2024Review
- Optimizing prediction models for pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy: Current status and future perspectives.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Deep learning-based prediction of post-pancreaticoduodenectomy pancreatic fistula.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Preoperative evaluation to determine the difficulty of No. 6 lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic gastrectomy.BMC surgery · 2024Article
- Exploring the application and future outlook of Artificial intelligence in pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Update of CT-Based Radiomics Applications in the Pre-Surgical Prediction of the Risk of Post-Operative Fistula, Resectability Status and Prognosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Machine learning models in clinical practice for the prediction of postoperative complications after major abdominal surgery.Surgery today · 2023Article
- Personal predictive model based on systemic inflammation markers for estimation of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2022Article
- Differential Performance of Machine Learning Models in Prediction of Procedure-Specific Outcomes.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022Article
- External validation of risk prediction platforms for pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy using nomograms and artificial intelligence.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite advancements in operative technique and improvements in postoperative managements, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a life-threatening complication following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). There are some reports to predict POPF preoperatively or intraoperatively, but the accuracy of those is questionable. Artificial intelligence (AI) technology is being actively used in the medical field, but few studies have reported applying it to outcomes after PD.
aimTo develop a risk prediction platform for POPF using an AI model.
methodsMedical records were reviewed from 1769 patients at Samsung Medical Center who underwent PD from 2007 to 2016. A total of 38 variables were inserted into AI-driven algorithms. The algorithms tested to make the risk prediction platform were random forest (RF) and a neural network (NN) with or without recursive feature elimination (RFE). The median imputation method was used for missing values. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to examine the discriminative power of algorithm for POPF prediction.
resultsThe number of POPFs was 221 (12.5%) according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula definition 2016. After median imputation, AUCs using 38 variables were 0.68 ± 0.02 with RF and 0.71 ± 0.02 with NN. The maximal AUC using NN with RFE was 0.74. Sixteen risk factors for POPF were identified by AI algorithm: Pancreatic duct diameter, body mass index, preoperative serum albumin, lipase level, amount of intraoperative fluid infusion, age, platelet count, extrapancreatic location of tumor, combined venous resection, co-existing pancreatitis, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, American Society of Anesthesiologists' score, sex, soft texture of the pancreas, underlying heart disease, and preoperative endoscopic biliary decompression. We developed a web-based POPF prediction platform, and this application is freely available at http://popfrisk.smchbp.org.
conclusionThis study is the first to predict POPF with multiple risk factors using AI. This platform is reliable (AUC 0.74), so it could be used to select patients who need especially intense therapy and to preoperatively establish an effective treatment strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.