ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2020
Predictive model for acute abdominal pain after transarterial chemoembolization for liver cancer.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construction and Validation of Prediction Model of Severe Abdominal Pain Post-Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients with HBV-Associated Primary Liver Cancer.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Trial
- Prediction Models for Acute and Chronic Postoperative Pain in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- High-Volume Dilution of Drug-Eluting Beads Reduces Severe Pain After DEB-TACE: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Strategies for Pain Management in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Transarterial Chemoembolisation: A Scoping Review of Current Evidence.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Perioperative nursing coordination and complication management in Yttrium-90 radioactive microsphere therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical predictors for liver function impairment and post-embolization syndrome following transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in primary hepatic carcinoma patients: a retrospective study.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- Nomogram for predicting severe abdominal pain after initial conventional transarterial chemoembolisation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Pain management in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation: A retrospective study.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023Article
- The short-term efficacy of DEB-TACE loaded with epirubicin and raltitrexed in the treatment of intermediate and advanced primary hepatocellular carcinoma.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTransarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the first-line treatment for patients with unresectable liver cancer; however, TACE is associated with postembolization pain.
aimTo analyze the risk factors for acute abdominal pain after TACE and establish a predictive model for postembolization pain.
methodsFrom January 2018 to September 2018, all patients with liver cancer who underwent TACE at our hospital were included. General characteristics; clinical, imaging, and procedural data; and postembolization pain were analyzed. Postembolization pain was defined as acute moderate-to-severe abdominal pain within 24 h after TACE. Logistic regression and a classification and regression tree were used to develop a predictive model. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to examine the efficacy of the predictive model.
resultsWe analyzed 522 patients who underwent a total of 582 TACE procedures. Ninety-seven (16.70%) episodes of severe pain occurred. A predictive model built based on the dataset from classification and regression tree analysis identified known invasion of blood vessels as the strongest predictor of subsequent performance, followed by history of TACE, method of TACE, and history of abdominal pain after TACE. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.736 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.682-0.789], the sensitivity was 73.2%, the specificity was 65.6%, and the negative predictive value was 92.4%. Logistic regression produced similar results by identifying age [odds ratio (OR) = 0.971; 95%CI: 0.951-0.992;
conclusionBlood vessel invasion, TACE history, TACE with drug-eluting beads, and history of abdominal pain after TACE are predictors of acute moderate-to-severe pain. The predictive model may help medical staff to manage pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.