ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2020
Role of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Functional outcomes and quality of life following open versus laparoscopic versus robot-assisted versus transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Pooled it
- Comparison of postoperative outcomes between conventional and low-impact laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Trial
- Impact of Surgical Approach, Patient Risk Factors, and Diverting Ileostomy on Anastomotic Leakage and Outcomes After Rectal Cancer Resection: A 5-Year Single-Center Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Robotic-assisted surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes: the Mayo Clinic experience.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- From Diversion to Permanence: Trends in Ostomy Creation in Rectal Cancer Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in cancer development: new insight from STAT3 signaling pathway to immune evasion.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Outcomes of open vs laparoscopic vs robotic vs transanal total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer: a network meta-analysis.Techniques in coloproctology · 2023Review
- Implementation of robotic rectal cancer surgery: a cross-sectional nationwide study.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Article
- Initial experience with a suprapubic single-port robotic right hemicolectomy in patients with colon cancer.Techniques in coloproctology · 2021Article
- [Evidence in minimally invasive oncological surgery of the colon and rectum].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Surgical resection for rectal cancer usually requires a proctectomy with respective lymphadenectomy (total mesorectal excision). This has traditionally been performed transabdominally through an open incision. Over the last thirty years, minimally invasive surgery platforms have rapidly evolved with the goal to accomplish the same quality rectal resection through a less invasive approach. There are currently three resective modalities that complement the traditional open operation: (1) Laparoscopic surgery; (2) Robotic surgery; and (3) Transanal total mesorectal excision. In addition, there are several platforms to carry out transluminal local excisions (without lymphadenectomy). Evidence on the various modalities is of mixed to moderate quality. It is unreasonable to expect a randomized comparison of all options in a single trial. This review aims at reviewing in detail the various techniques in regard to intra-/perioperative benchmarks, recovery and complications, oncological and functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.