Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32874044›Full record

Trial reportMiddle East African journal of ophthalmology

Clinical Outcomes of Silk versus Nylon Sutures for Suturing of Conjunctival Autograft in Pterygium Surgery.

Hossein Jamali, Mostafa Abuali, Mohammad R Khalili

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Middle East African journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hossein JamaliPoostchi Ophthalmology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mostafa AbualiPoostchi Ophthalmology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohammad R KhaliliPoostchi Ophthalmology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose is to compare the clinical results of using silk versus nylon sutures for conjunctival autograft suturing in pterygium surgery.

methodsIn this prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial 50 eyes from 50 patients with primary nasal pterygium were randomized to undergo pterygium surgery with the use of either nylon sutures or silk sutures for conjunctival autograft suturing. Patients were followed up for 6 months. Main outcome measures included recurrence, postoperative discomfort according to a visual analog scale (VAS), graft hyperemia, and graft edema.

resultsAccording to the results, there was no significant difference between groups regarding recurrence rate of pterygium (

conclusionBoth silk and nylon are effective suture materials for autograft suturing in pterygium surgery with similar postoperative discomfort and recurrence rate. Significantly greater number of nylon sutures remains buried on the autograft and could not be removed easily.

Indexed as

NylonsSilkSuturesSuture TechniquesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAutograftsConjunctivaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOphthalmologic Surgical ProceduresPostoperative PeriodNylonsSilkConjunctival autograftnylonpterygium surgerysilk

Identifiers

PMID32874044
PMCPMC7442075
OpenAlexW3044107812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.