Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32873965›Full record

ArticleHeredity2021

Genomic insight into the developmental history of southern highbush blueberry populations.

Soichiro Nishiyama, Mao Fujikawa, Hisayo Yamane, Kenta Shirasawa, Ebrahiem Babiker, Ryutaro Tao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interspecific hybridization history ofHorticulture research · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genetic Diversity and Identification ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Biodiversity ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Soichiro NishiyamaGraduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8502, Japan. nishiyama.soichiro.8e@kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3451-6166
Mao FujikawaGraduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8502, Japan.
Hisayo YamaneGraduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8502, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9044-7863
Kenta ShirasawaKazusa DNA Research Institute, 2-6-7 Kazusa-kamatari, Kisarazu, Chiba, 292-0818, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7880-6221
Ebrahiem BabikerUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Thad Cochran Southern Horticultural Laboratory, 810 Hwy 26W, Poplarville, MS, 39470, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6464-2529
Ryutaro TaoGraduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8502, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interspecific hybridization is a common breeding approach for introducing novel traits and genetic diversity to breeding populations. Southern highbush blueberry (SHB) is a blueberry cultivar group that has been intensively bred over the last 60 years. Specifically, it was developed by multiple interspecific crosses between northern highbush blueberry [NHB, Vaccinium corymbosum L. (2n = 4x = 48)] and low-chill Vaccinium species to expand the geographic limits of highbush blueberry production. In this study, we genotyped polyploid blueberries, including 105 SHB, 17 NHB, and 10 rabbiteye blueberry (RE) (Vaccinium virgatum Aiton), from the accessions planted at Poplarville, Mississippi, and accessions distributed in Japan, based on the double-digest restriction site-associated DNA sequencing. The genome-wide SNP data clearly indicated that RE cultivars were genetically distinct from SHB and NHB cultivars, whereas NHB and SHB were genetically indistinguishable. The population structure results appeared to reflect the differences in the allele selection strategies that breeders used for developing germplasm adapted to local climates. The genotype data implied that there are no or very few genomic segments that were commonly introgressed from low-chill Vaccinium species to the SHB genome. Principal component analysis-based outlier detection analysis found a few loci associated with a variable that could partially differentiate NHB and SHB. These SNP loci were detected in Mb-scale haplotype blocks and may be close to the functional genes related to SHB development. Collectively, the data generated in this study suggest a polygenic adaptation of SHB to the southern climate, and may be relevant for future population-scale genome-wide analyses of blueberry.

Indexed as

Blueberry PlantsGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsJapanMetagenomics

Identifiers

PMID32873965
PMCPMC7853091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.